Ariel Sharon dead

Do not be under any misconception that the pullout from Gaza was for the benefit of anyone other than Isreal and Ariel Sharon's hatred of Palestinians.

I mentioned it in an earlier post, it was still however the best chance the area has had for a while.

He was not only a good commander and canny strategist on the battlefield (a point not missed by the Isreal tribunal on Sabra etc) but also in the political arena...his visit to Temple Mount and his turn around on settlements was subtlety engineered to create tensions, both amongst the Israelis and Palestinians, he was a genius at creating conflict as well as perpetrating it. His opposition to the Camp David talks and Ehud Barak also illustrate how Ariel Sharon has no intention of ever having peace with the Palestinians. If not for him, peace and and independent state for Palestine may have came through Ehud Barak, it certainly was never a possibilty under Ariel Sharon.

I would disagree with your analysis, but we will never know as he had a stroke. I think he had realised that the only way to secure Israel's borders was to give ground to the Palestinians hence the withdrawal from Gaza and the planned withdrawal from the West Bank.

But I think we will probably have to agree to disagree on this one.
 
I mentioned it in an earlier post, it was still however the best chance the area has had for a while.

I feel that if Ariel Sharon had not so vehemently opposed and effectively character assassinated Ehud Barak, then perhaps Palestine would have had the best chance of Peace and independence from Israel. So I would disagree to some extent as in none of Ariel Sharon's actions was the creation of a separate, independent Palestinian State forthcoming.


I would disagree with your analysis, but we will never know as he had a stroke. I think he had realised that the only way to secure Israel's borders was to give ground to the Palestinians hence the withdrawal from Gaza and the planned withdrawal from the West Bank.

I would point out that the a West Bank withdrawal under Sharon was very limited, intentionally so and precipitated by the building of The Barrier (albeit also under the pretext of stopping further terrorist bombings), also I think it was obvious that by withdrawing from Gaza and effectively annexing it from the West Bank and outside support would create a void into which Hamas could prosper and along with the increased tension amongst Israeli settlers it can be objectively argued (and some Israeli Liberal commentators have done so) that it was a calculated act to ensure that no Palestinian State could or would be a single entity while creating a groundswell of opposition amongst both Israeli and Palestinian toward each other, therefore following the age old military tactic of divide and rule.

But I think we will probably have to agree to disagree on this one.

Of course, we both know we have a different view on Israeli policy regarding the Palestinians and Zionism, but I hope we both respect each other's views and use them to consider other avenues and perspectives nonetheless and do not devolve into the kind of nonsense some have in these kind of conversations. :)
 
Last edited:
Glad he's dead tbh. I'll just leave it at that.

And whilst people 'have a go' at the Jews for moving into the area and attempting to kick the Palestinians out, they were given permission to go there by the UN and UK without clearance or acceptance from the Palestinian people.
So I do see both sides of the argument, but ultimately both sides have done hideous things to one another. I just feel sorry for the innocent people living and dying in the area.

No they wern't given 'permission' as you refer to it. Jewish terrorists invaded the lands there using the balfour treaty as an excuse - nothing was actually agreed by the British nor the UN. Read the balfour treaty - it doesn't state they have permission to do what they did, and you might also want to re-check your evaluation of the UN's position on the creation of Israel - its been discussed many a time here on this forum.

His ability as a military commander and strategist is beyond question. He is dead and as FF says, he had family and I respect that but the treatment if Palestinians under his premiership is not something I remember with fondness. Their treatment and the repugnant hypocrisy of the US looking the other way while preaching the fight for freedom for all leaves a nasty taste in the mouth.

I hope he has found peace although his legacy has ensured that the Palestinians have not.

I'm glad he's out of his misery - 7 years in a coma is a harsh way to go, even though he was clearly pro-zionist, and not interested in actual peace - The rest is between him and his Lord now ;)

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2014/01/sharon-architect-terror-20141124489119748.html

I would point out that the a West Bank withdrawal under Sharon was very limited, intentionally so and precipitated by the building of The Barrier (albeit also under the pretext of stopping further terrorist bombings), also I think it was obvious that by withdrawing from Gaza and effectively annexing it from the West Bank and outside support would create a void into which Hamas could prosper and along with the increased tension amongst Israeli settlers it can be objectively argued (and some Israeli Liberal commentators have done so) that it was a calculated act to ensure that no Palestinian State could or would be a single entity while creating a groundswell of opposition amongst both Israeli and Palestinian toward each other, therefore following the age old military tactic of divide and rule.

^^This - well said Castiel - Israel was and is still known to make it look like they are making compromises/ are the victims when in the long run they are actually setting themselves up for more land grabbing. Have a look at this for example for violations of the truce treaty since 2012:

http://flotillahyvesarchief.weebly.com/truce-violations-2012-13.html

Although they kill and slaughter palestinians all the time, most of this doesn't make the mainstream news - so generally people side with them, when they claim a rocket attack killed someone in Israel and they try to justify sending in bombers and taking out a palestinian hospital or refugee camp...



My answer to the problem in Israel and Palestine is simple and one that the western nations should be interested in as the 'palestinian cause' is a well known reason for promoting 'islamic terrorism', and some of the tensions between the middle-eastern nations:

A one-state solution. Not divide the people with two states. Call it whatever you like, israel, smisrael, baytul-maqdis, palestisrael whatever. For thousands of years all muslims, christians and jews lived in peace in Israel. Only since the zionist terrorist groups invaded and created Israel has there been a seperation between all three of these abrahamic religions, recently.

Funny how we in the west are quick to jump and introduce regime change in all four corners of the world, but refuse to be involved in this one (occasionally denouncing violence from both sides but not actually doing anything, bearing in mind we (western nations) are the root cause of the zionist terrorists invading them lands - i.e. them using the UN and Balfour treaty as excuses for being there). BUT - we are where we are, and have to move forward rather than dwelling on the past.

Remove the current governments on both sides, along with the borders and introduce this ideology called 'democracy' we keep banding about at the other nations. Let ALL the people democratically elect who they want in charge and let everyone there live equally (as they used to before), with equal rights to vote, eat, live, own land, sleep etc.

The world will be a much better and safer place for it. Peace does not exist in a two-state solution as neither side is willing to give up anything really....

I pray that both sides can learn to live in peace together, bearing in mind we are now in the year 2014! peace out.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom