Appearance isn't irrelevent - it's an important factor and anyone who says it isnt is wrong. However it's just that - a factor.
You dont go and buy a crap car because it looks good when there are numerous far better cars which you dont think look as good. Thats just nonsensical. Especially when we are talking about stuff like Vauxhall Astras and VW Golfs. I mean come on, lets get a bit of perspective here. It's a Vauxhall Astra not an Aston Martin. It's not as if the styling snaps knicker elastic at 10 paces or is the sort of thing you'd hang a poster on your wall, is it?
It's.. an Astra. Sure it looks quite good with its skirts and blue paint, but it is just an Astra.
I guess it comes down to what you want in a car. Do you want a drive ornament? If so, buy the Astra. Actually don't, buy a Porsche 911 and dont drive it. Do you want a great car? If so, buy something that isn't an Astra.
You've done zero practical research and are already slagging off pretty much the rest of the class - a class of cars seperated by things like handling, power, ride and quality - things you can't judge on the internet.
We might be 'someone on the internet' but the difference between you and us is that some of us have actually driven these cars (and then bought none of them, showing that our opinions here are therefore truely impartial and not biased towards what we eventually picked).
The Astra is a one trick pony.
Trouble is I guess you'll drive the others and still buy the Astra - because on a spin around the block the first time you've ever driven a car like this you probably wont have the confidence (or it wont be appropriate) to test them in a way that will quickly reveal the inadaquecies of some and the strengths of others.
A Focus ST and an Astra VXR feel much of a muchness on the 0.5 mile test route around Evans Halshaw Vauxhall, so you'll probably declare the Astra is still better.
Still, I guess it's academic if you'll park the new one at the bottom of a snowy hill on a junction
