The point is, suggesting that 5.4% is a good rate to someone who is actively looking and quite possibly in a better position than you were is unfair. It's not a case of disagreeing or agreeing, it's a case of presenting the facts as they are, that a 5.4% rate is not the best route into a car (it's also not the worst, granted).Think we'll have to agree to disagree on this one.
Ah hang on there, I never suggested that the rate is good to someone else. So you misquoting me is rather unfair, wouldn't you agree?The point is, suggesting that 5.4% is a good rate to someone who is actively looking and quite possibly in a better position than you were is unfair. It's not a case of disagreeing or agreeing, it's a case of presenting the facts as they are, that a 5.4% rate is not the best route into a car (it's also not the worst, granted).
No we wont, i am telling you something as fact! As Basher also mentions, it is unfair to impart that advice on someone who may not be in that same sub prime situation as yourself. He is not there yet and is asking for adviceThink we'll have to agree to disagree on this one.
You stating that X% is a terrible rate is opinion, not fact. And as I've stated, I have not "advised" that is the right option, merely provided facts and the option I took. The only input I have provided to him is details of the broker I used. Problem with that?No we wont, i am telling you something as fact! As Basher also mentions, it is unfair to impart that advice on someone who may not be in that same sub prime situation as yourself. He is not there yet and is asking for advice
It is fact, it is a bad rate. I have even taken the time to explain why it is a bad rate, and how someone may achieve a much better rate.You stating that X% is a terrible rate is opinion, not fact. And as I've stated, I have not "advised" that is the right option, merely provided facts and the option I took. The only input I have provided to him is details of the broker I used. Problem with that?
Offset against your house (even easier if you already have a charge on it!) and then put the car payments against it in addition to any normal overpayments which you had planned to make. The net position is better and you will not delay paying off the house beyond the timeframe you mention.
Or just extend the borrowing? As long as you have a healthy LTV then I don't see why there would be any penalty.In his situation of already making the maximum allowable overpayment (allowing for that max limit to change slightly to account for the additional borrowing), he would presumably have to somewhat extend his planned duration as he wouldn't necessarily be able to put the entire extra £350pm into his mortgage without incurring some sort of penalty?
I agree it's a financially more sensible way of doing it (and also frees you up to modify it or sell it etc. at your whim) but he may well have to adjust his plans to be paid off in 6 years I think?
Or just extend the borrowing? As long as you have a healthy LTV then I don't see why there would be any penalty.
That isnt how an additional charge works. It is in effect a 2nd mortgage, he would be free to raise this on a differing product to charge #1In his situation of already making the maximum allowable overpayment (allowing for that max limit to change slightly to account for the additional borrowing), he would presumably have to somewhat extend his planned duration as he wouldn't necessarily be able to put the entire extra £350pm into his mortgage without incurring some sort of penalty?
I agree it's a financially more sensible way of doing it (and also frees you up to modify it or sell it etc. at your whim) but he may well have to adjust his plans to be paid off in 6 years I think?
Indeed this need not affect the primary chargeThat's what I was questioning - in this case he has a plan to pay off in 6 years and is making max overpayments already - if he wants to use this method of financing, he'll have to adjust his plans, whereas Jez has suggested he could do this without delaying paying off his mortgage beyond his planned timeframe.
Indeed this need not affect the primary charge
That doesnt seem amazing, but must be the best option you can have found so far? The loan is an additional one, so it wont get muddied with the main and original one (and therefore should pass your wife test just as a loan would! ) The only difference is that the security for it, is the house.
I'm amazed, first my rate of finance is terrible, and now you don't think 2.99% is amazing. Do you live in a world where you expect everyone to be lent money at the current base rate?!That doesnt seem amazing, but must be the best option you can have found so far? The loan is an additional one, so it wont get muddied with the main and original one (and therefore should pass your wife test just as a loan would! ) The only difference is that the security for it, is the house.
I have explained what a good rate should be at the moment, read up. For ease of reading; i would expect a sensible LTV additional loan to be offered at around 2% or slightly lower.I'm amazed, first my rate of finance is terrible, and now you don't think 2.99% is amazing. Do you live in a world where you expect everyone to be lent money at the current base rate?!