WTF are these Sky ads. God Loves You at London Excel
Very harsh. Those sorts of comings together are pretty easy if it’s 50/50. It’s not like he forced him off track, Perez turned in and he understeered a bit.Russell got 2 penalty points for punting Perez off!
Very harsh. Those sorts of comings together are pretty easy if it’s 50/50. It’s not like he forced him off track, Perez turned in and he understeered a bit.
They really need to penalise Verstappens defending properly if they’re going to give penalty points for stuff like that. It makes a mockery.
Watched the highlights last night. Seemed like a decent race. Any mention of the flares though? They were ridiculous. How were the drivers happy racing through that for the first few laps?
It really wasn't a 50/50. Watching George's onboard you can see Checo was ahead going into the corner and all through the corner until he got hit. Going by the rules it was a clear penalty. Just like Gasly who got the same penalty for his crash with Seb.
Ahead going into the corner? Nah, they were the very definition of side-by-side.
Checo's front wing is ahead of George's as they get to the corner. Not by much but he's ahead
But look at how close he's positioned himself. Putting himself there he's asking for an unreasonable level of positioning on corner exit from Russell. Punishing Russell for Pérez positioning himself there is unreasonable.
That's well into the corner by that point and yes he might have got along side there for a split second but doesn't change the fact that Checo was ahead going into the corner which George would/ should have seen as his onboard shows us that.
But even then the rules say the car overtaking on the outside needs to have significant portion of the car alongside which he clearly does at all times.
You could also say it's unreasonable for George to defend against what was clearly a much faster car.
My initial thoughts when I watched it live were that Perez caused that. However, on watching the replay it looks more like a 50/50. I mean, I know George got a penalty, but who suffered more? It felt more like a little slap on the wrist given the circumstances and outcomes. I know they are not supposed to take into account outcomes, but I am sure there is some unconscious bias going on in this instance.
It wasn’t shown but the commentators did mention that he pitted twice in a row, which would align with the tyre issue.Just noticed that Alonso's front left came lose during the race, which is what he was under investigation for "release in an unsafe condition" for. I don't remember that being picked up in the coverage at all?
lol utter nonsense. Even if Checo was ahead it doesn't give him the right to turn into a car on the inside because the car on the inside has absolutely nowhere to go apart from slamming on the brakes and losing probably 4 places as a result of traffic. No-one is ever going to do that and it's just as bad a manoeuvre as a Verstappen torpedo up the inside expecting the other car to go off track to avoid a collision. Judging by these incidents and lack of penalties for RB drivers so far, something needs to change because they're clearly being educated/trained by management into overly aggressive moves like this which goes along with Max's "win it or bin it" mentality from karting days.You could also say it's unreasonable for George to defend against what was clearly a much faster car.
RB fans really want to turn F1 into football don't theyStay classy