We’re communist now I guess as we have speed limits, which means realistically the person in the Ford Focus and Aston Martin are going to get from A-B in the same time.
Yes we have speed limits but no acceleration or deceleration limits.
We’re communist now I guess as we have speed limits, which means realistically the person in the Ford Focus and Aston Martin are going to get from A-B in the same time.
All very important on motorways during rush hour...
Wait...!
As already mentioned that acceleration, deceleration and corner speed could still be used on empty minor roads, just not busy motorways. Coincidentally that’s generally the situation now. Go figure...
This thread clearly shows the difference between people who think the status quo is maintainable long into the future (which it isnt), and those that can see that change is necessary and not beyond the wit of man.
Do you even have to ask?!
You're happy with your drive times?
You're happy with the number of people killed on the roads each year?
You're happy with the number of people injured on the roads each year?
You're happy with being delayed for hours on end on the motorway due to accidents caused by human error?
You're happy with the cost of motoring?
You're happy with the pollution caused by vehicles?
You're happy that older or disabled people do not have independent mobility?
You're happy with drunk drivers on the road?
Just a few examples.
And dont forget - the majority of the above will get much worse in the in future unless we do something about it.
economics for a start, the rest of the world will implement AV and will have a massive cost saving over those that dont. its a huge cost as everything has to be transported.
That's the strongest reason for why its unsustainable but not the only reason.
and no it won't just be replacing one issue with another. IT IS SAFER. meaning you're replacing lots of accidents with few but maybe new reasons for accidents.