Do you have something you want to share as to why you are against taxing the wealthy?Maybe add some content to the thread? Do you agree with this politics of envy tax?
Does anyone?
Do you have something you want to share as to why you are against taxing the wealthy?Maybe add some content to the thread? Do you agree with this politics of envy tax?
Does anyone?
Im against idiotic and inefficient taxes.Do you have something you want to share as to why you are against taxing the wealthy?
Haha ignoring how inefficient the civil service is you are adding millions more into actual assessments some of which is based on trust and which could result in prison sentences and you think that could be absorbed into current budgets?
Diane Abbot is that you? Lol
Pathetic.
As I said the millions you speak of are already in there just your too ignorant to understand that. The more wealthy will already be within the system as a whole, as such they already understand the issues with false reporting and very very few ever end up in prision.
Most people arent dumb enough to deliberatly put themselves into that position.
They wouldn’t have a clue how to do a self assessment. It’s one of the reasons of many why I think the CGT changes will fail. You start to pick up people that have never done an SA in the their life so are only going to ignore it.Thats rubbish and you know it - most people are on PAYE and dont give the tax man a second thought. You want to add all of them into some sort of manual assessment system and there wont be a cost just lol..
Your idea is poorly thought through and you know it.
Thats rubbish and you know it - most people are on PAYE and dont give the tax man a second thought. You want to add all of them into some sort of manual assessment system and there wont be a cost just lol..
Your idea is poorly thought through and you know it.
They wouldn’t have a clue how to do a self assessment. It’s one of the reasons of many why I think the CGT changes will fail. You start to pick up people that have never done an SA in the their life so are only going to ignore it.
What's your idea?Im against idiotic and inefficient taxes.
Do you think this is a good idea?
What's your idea?
I’d happily engage with most people on this forum sharing different viewpoints. You however have spent the majority of the last two years lingering around playing the pantomime villain. Beyond mocking the irony of your posts when you’ve decided you want a grown up discussion you’re not worth any more of my time.Maybe add some content to the thread? Do you agree with this politics of envy tax?
Does anyone?
I’d happily engage with most people on this forum sharing different viewpoints. You however have spent the majority of the last two years lingering around playing the pantomime villain. Beyond mocking the irony of your posts when you’ve decided you want a grown up discussion you’re not worth any more of my time.
Lol
Define income?Tax income / tax purchases - dont create some bizarre hybrid where you tax ongoing basic ownership.
This is basically 'Sorry pleb you're too poor to have a nice car or own your own home..'
Money received for work or investments.Define income?
We have taken a 10 year holiday from home ownership, not having seen a property that we would want to own. We stayed in one rental property whose rent never increased over that time. We obviously have money in building societies as we sold our last house and banked the cash.
Now we are buying a house (I am retired) and much reducing our bank balances in the process.
I am wondering how this wealth tax system would have affected us? We have declared all interest, poor that it was and paid any taxes due. We will now pay stamp duty and continue to pay property taxes to the local authority.
Would the intention be to increase tax take on accounts held in a building society or bank by making them some sort of personal allowance scheme similar to income?
And now we own a property, what kind of proportion of equity do you forsee going to government annually? Is this in addition to the local precept or instead of?
For such a major change in the countries taxation, it would need more than a simple manifesto commitment and a vote through parliament. It would take many years of work on a cross party platform so what is suggested is unlikely before 2040 ish at the earliest in my opinion. Thankfully that let's me out, I'll be too old, but it definitely will be a long process.
Who exactly do you think the bank will pass the cost of their 4.5k bill on to?
If you tax them into a loss on mortgages why would they lend?Mortgage industry is heavily regulated. They can only pass on to the customers the charges we allow them to pass on.
If you tax them into a loss on mortgages why would they lend?
I suspect a Wealth Tax would work better in principal then it would do in practice, similar to inheritance tax. The moment a wealth tax gets announced the fabulously wealthy are going to hide their assets abroad or given to people or entities that are out of scope.No, they're meant to capture tax from the wealthy. Wealth shouldn't just be on income. I'm not saying a percentage of house price is the right answer, but there are folk who have millions of quids in assets paying next to nothing.
If genuinely wealthy folk were paying their fair share, then we wouldn't have such disparity to the poor.
I didn't lose any sleep but it does seem like a hole in your plan. Say a £270,000 mortgage on a £300,000 property, how much profit does a lender make compared to your 1-2% tax which would cost them £2,700-£5,400?Their margins are high enough, they can absorb it. It can be slightly less profitable for the banks, I wouldn't lose any sleep over it and neither should you.