*ticks off bingo cardfar right
*ticks off bingo cardfar right
Just bring back the cane.
when did it get banned the late 70s? thankfully I wasn't born then
*ticks off bingo card
EU elections: how Italy’s far-right leader Giorgia Meloni framed her politics throughout the campaign
Just bring back the cane.
Still had public caning in Singapore schools back in the late 90s going on 2000sIt was a lot later than that, mid 80's iirc.
It was used when I was at school to great effect along with board erasers being thrown and a smack round the head.
Still had public caning in Singapore schools back in the late 90s going on 2000s
Literally the whole school would be in the auditorium (this would be over 2000 students + teachers) and watching xyz person get caned lol
Good deterrent
Exactly what you expect from the far right. Short sighted simplistic approach, that completely fails to understand the cause.
Cause? Explain please.
I'm a bit confused about what causes aggression and bad behaviour towards teachers.
And why you would think it acceptable.
There are very many different reasons and this is a very well studied topic with many best practices.
No one said it was acceptable . Just some of us actually would like a solution that works and has positives outcomes for all parties and has a positive ROI for society, rather than simplistic punishment that cruelly punish pupils without ever solving the underlying problem and inevitably leading to much higher societal costs.
What, don't you want to solve the problems rather than punish children for actions that they most likely do not even have control over?
The bigger question is why 20% of children have mental health issues.
The human brain is the most complex object in the universe. Developmental issues are expected. Also note that in general experts prefer terms like neural diversity because in many ways are neural functionality is simply different to the main population but these might not be dysfunctional nor pathological but typical and expected differences of cognitive functionThe bigger question is why 20% of children have mental health issues.
Do any of these best practices work?
What do you mean by ROI? To me that means the Republic of Ireland.
I'd love to solve the problems and at least someone has come up with a suggestion,
whether or not you you believe that to be acceptable.
I disagree that children, or people in general, have no control over their actions, although that is a debate for another thread. There is always a choice.
What is your solution? Or are you like the Labour Party, who seem to constantly criticise, but never offer a viable alternative.
Because another poster brought it up midway through the thread. Or do you think the he should have predicted this?If that's the bigger question and you're the OP, why didn't you post that question to begin with?
Hint: moving goalposts is a fool's errand and is lazy at best and in bad faith at worst.
So these are the best practises you were referring to? Where has this been tested?Investments in teacher education and training to manage children with behavioural problems and to better recognise neural divergent children, better investments in childhood mental health with things like rapid testing and psychological and social training for children that occur in-school, much smaller classroom sizes, specialised teachers to handle classes with more challenging and divergent children, increased teacher aids and education specialist to be available in class and provide personalised education curricula, support and awareness for family therapy.
Because another poster brought it up midway through the thread. Or do you think the he should have predicted this?
So these are the best practises you were referring to? Where has this been tested?
Results: Observations showed that children in large classes were more likely to show off-task behaviour of all kinds, and more likely to interact with their peers in terms of off-task behaviour, social, and also on-task behaviours. Connections between class size and PBR factors were not strong. There was no support for the view that peer relations are better in smaller classes; indeed, there was a slight tendency for worse peer relations, in terms of aggression, asocial and excluded, in the smallest classes
- The NICHD study examined the long-term effects of class size on student behavior. Smaller class sizes were linked to improved student behavior, with fewer instances of disruptive conduct reported. (Source: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Early Child Care Research Network. (2002). Early child care and children's development in the primary grades: Follow-up results from the NICHD Study of Early Child Care. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 133-164.)
- The Project STAR study in Tennessee, a well-known investigation into the effects of class size reduction, found that students in smaller classes exhibited improved behavior. Smaller classes allowed teachers to better manage and address behavioral issues, creating a more positive and conducive learning environment. (Source: Finn, J. D., & Achilles, C. M. (1999). Tennessee's class size study: Findings, implications, misconceptions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(2), 97-109.)
- The SAGE program in Wisconsin, which aimed to reduce class sizes in elementary school districts, reported positive effects on student behavior. Smaller classes were associated with improved classroom discipline and a more positive atmosphere. (Source: Molnar, A., Smith, P., Zahorik, J., Palmer, A., Halbach, A., & Ehrle, K. (1999). Evaluating the SAGE program: A pilot program in targeted pupil-teacher reduction in Wisconsin. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(2), 165-177.)
- California's statewide class size reduction initiative found that students in smaller classes demonstrated improved behavior, including reduced instances of disruptive behavior. The study emphasized the role of smaller classes in creating a more manageable and positive learning environment. (Source: Achilles, C. M., & Finn, J. D. (1996). Tennessee's class size study: A summary. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(9), 676-679.)