Lol, i'm not here to prove that God exist, i'm exposing the homosexuals/gays and gay activists childish demands that everyone accept their behaviour/conduct.You can not prove god.
![Big Grin :D :D](/styles/default/xenforo/vbSmilies/Normal/biggrin.gif)
Lol, i'm not here to prove that God exist, i'm exposing the homosexuals/gays and gay activists childish demands that everyone accept their behaviour/conduct.You can not prove god.
To be expected from a God haterAs Dawkins so eloquently put it.
Just lol chap, if i read the koran or about muhamaad or talk to a muslim does that make me a muslim?, lol Castiel, if i read up on homosexuals/gay people or work alongside with them or eat a meal at the same table does that make me a gay/homosexual?, just lol.It's what you think it teaches. By definition, if you follow the teachings of Christ, then you are a Christian.
Does it have muppets on it?There's a lovely cheesecake in the fridge.
Because the new testamant also shows that homosexuality is wrong conduct in God's eyes.What?
If they don't follow other Old Testament values, why do they follow that stance on homosexual relationships?
Just lol chap, if i read the koran or about muhamaad or talk to a muslim does that make me a muslim?, lol Castiel, if i read up on homosexuals/gay people or work alongside with them or eat a meal at the same table does that make me a gay/homosexual?, just lol.
They will not agree with my assessment on the Pauline Epistles and how they relate to the morality of homosexuality. It has nothing to do with the act or how Catholics feel about it.
And I wasn't saying Kedge and Catholics were the same, only that each will disagree with me due to there respective doctrines.
Social Services is never preferable. If a loving homosexual couple had wanted, or be able, to adopt me as a child then I would have been saved a whole world of pain and trouble.
Because they want to follow that stance. It's part of their dogma. They don't have to. Not difficult dude!
Which word of the two did you not understand? Maybe a dictionary or something or asking someone who has a grasp of basic English?
He did say they would love each other. He didn't say they shouldn't be with whom they truly love. You're confused because he wrote one thing and you read something completely different.
You are blind. Homosexual/Gay people have basic human rights under most normal circumstances like most other people do. they get married, they adopt children, they are successful in business, their are many celebrities that are homosexual/Gay so your point is moot, this cake business is just another childish demand that everyone should conform to the gay/homosexual worldview or behaviour or conduct, like spoilt little kids who stamp their feet demanding this and that.
Just lol chap, if i read the koran or about muhamaad or talk to a muslim does that make me a muslim?, lol Castiel, if i read up on homosexuals/gay people or work alongside with them or eat a meal at the same table does that make me a gay/homosexual?, just lol.
Having children is one of the best things people do in their lives. By marrying someone of the same sex you can only adopt which isn't ideal. It's better to be in a relationship with someone of the opposite sex because you can still love them even if you do not find them as good looking and you can have kids.
In what way do they differ out of curiosity, as I was brought up with more or less the same beliefs (Catholic).
But are there enough straight couples able to fill the role?
It's the only point which has ever stuck in my throat is the idea of homosexuals with children. Not because I necessarily believe they are going to whole scale abuse them, but simply because I genuienly believe it doesn't really fit into a healthy lifestyle.
By being Homosexual, you are placing yourself in a relationship where you cannot naturally have children. If the love that you experience is real,that homosexuality is natural, then surely there should be an element of embracing what this naturally brings?
I'm sure I'll get shouted down for re-inforcing gender concepts (for the record, I come from a very matriarchal family, and have no problem whatsover with any equality for women), but I genuinely believe that a child growing up needs a man and a woman in his life.
But hey, I'm sure my differences will have me labelled as a bigot.
agreed. children need a father and a mother
agreed. children need a father and a mother
The evidence shows otherwise. Children adopted by gay parents fare just as well as those adopted by heterosexual parents with one study showing that they can also fare better. It seems that what matters most is a stable loving home environment rather than the gender and sexuality of the parents.
I may have some Christian qualities perhaps?, but i don't see myself as a true Christian. I know me better than you castiel and God knows us better than we know ourselves, my actions, behaviour and conduct does not mirror that of the Christ so therefore i am not a true Christian. I am a defender of the Abrahamic God and a defender of the Christ wherever i can be and sometimes to expose the corruption in this world. If you are happy calling me a Christian then let YOUR blindness guide YOU.If you read the Bible it doesn't make you a Christian, if you follow the teachings of Christ, believe Christ is the path to salvation and accept the Bible as the word (either literal or inspired) of God then, by definition, you are a Christian.
I may have some Christian qualities perhaps?, but i don't see myself as a true Christian. I know me better than you.
He didn't say "fare just as well". He said "need".
While neither are true, it's preferable above all else that it be a mother and a father raising their child, when it comes to adoption I can see how it might be viewed as positive if they're adopted by anyone who can pass the requirements set. Most children are brainwashed into believing nonsense anyway, not that much different if they're given unusual sexual mores (if that even happened).
Its preferable above all else that the person(s) tasked with raising a child are both loving and capable...what sex or sexuality they are is completely irrelevant.