Batman origins Benchmark

murah · 27 Oct 2013 at 22:42

Kaapstad said:
The difference between having a dedicated PhysX card and doing it all on a single card

Single stock Titan @1080p, no dedicated PhysX card

Single stock Titan @1080p, plus a dedicated PhysX card

Nice, what is your dedicated card?

Tonester0011 · 27 Oct 2013 at 22:44

murah said:
Nice, what is your dedicated card?

It's another Titan

Kaap, what's the difference when using both cards in SLI instead of 1 doing the grunt and the other doing the physX?

Kaapstad · 28 Oct 2013 at 01:52

Tonester0011 said:
It's another Titan

Kaap, what's the difference when using both cards in SLI instead of 1 doing the grunt and the other doing the physX?

Two stock Titans @1080p, no dedicated PhysX card

Two stock Titans @1080p, plus a dedicated PhysX card

Kaapstad · 28 Oct 2013 at 02:12

Three stock Titans @1080p, no dedicated PhysX card

Three stock Titans @1080p, plus a dedicated PhysX card

Rusty0611 · 28 Oct 2013 at 02:20

Anyone actually played this over a period of time on max settings? It really heats me 780 up like nothing else. Hitting 90c on default fan profile

.

That's TXAA on max as well as PhysX, 2560x1440 resolution and otherwise max settings.

johny dolan · 28 Oct 2013 at 02:27

Ive got 6 hours play so far maxed settings never seen slowdown yet but I have sli 780s on water.

The game is ok fun I think but got it free with gfx card and don't think its worth £40 tbh.

Kaapstad · 28 Oct 2013 at 02:59

From what I can see this game does not support more than 2 way SLI

If you have more than 1 card and want to use PhysX, dedicate a card entirely to PhysX as using autoselect in the SLI setup seems to wreck fps.

If NVidia are serious about 4K they really need to work on multi GPU support. Two Titans plus a third for PhysX at 1600p will manage just over 100fps, this translates as about 55 fps @4K which is really not enough.

spankingtexan · 28 Oct 2013 at 09:03

http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=189866103

Minimum 179

Maximum 582

Average 345

4770K @ 4.5GHz

GTX 780 SLI @ 1150MHz

1920 X 1080

Everything completely maxed out.

Edit:
somat not right here, I have in 1920X1080 but the bench starts in windowed mode, how do you get it to start in full screen? that probably why I get that silly high score.

Sorted now, all settings as above

Minimum 69

Maximum 137

Average 97

almighty15 · 28 Oct 2013 at 09:14

Kaapstad said:
From what I can see this game does not support more than 2 way SLI

If you have more than 1 card and want to use PhysX, dedicate a card entirely to PhysX as using autoselect in the SLI setup seems to wreck fps.

If NVidia are serious about 4K they really need to work on multi GPU support. Two Titans plus a third for PhysX at 1600p will manage just over 100fps, this translates as about 55 fps @4K which is really not enough.

It doesn't scale like that.... As the 290X has proven, 4k is all about raw filtrate and even 3x Titans are not that much better then 2x 290X's in that regard.

Kaapstad · 28 Oct 2013 at 15:58

almighty15 said:
It doesn't scale like that.... As the 290X has proven, 4k is all about raw filtrate and even 3x Titans are not that much better then 2x 290X's in that regard.

From what I have seen it does scale like that.

What you have got to remember is AMD are fond of turning the settings down to get their 4gb cards to run.

Heavy modded skyrim on a 290X @4k, not a chance even using 4 of them.

The Titans will run it though.

johny dolan · 28 Oct 2013 at 16:28

Small overclock on my cards to match the EVGA Classified boost 1044 give me a extra 10 fps

Min = 55
Max = 127
AVG = 86

Kaapstad · 28 Oct 2013 at 16:31

johny dolan said:
Small overclock on my cards to match the EVGA Classified boost 1044 give me a extra 10 fps

Min = 55
Max = 127
AVG = 86

Have you tried dedicating one card to just PhysX

You may find you get a higher score.

almighty15 · 28 Oct 2013 at 16:32

Kaapstad said:
From what I have seen it does scale like that.

What you have got to remember is AMD are fond of turning the settings down to get their 4gb cards to run.

Heavy modded skyrim on a 290X @4k, not a chance even using 4 of them.

The Titans will run it though.

No....Just No..... Running maxed out at 4k the 290X still beats the Nvidia cards, and beats them by some margin too.

johny dolan · 28 Oct 2013 at 16:33

No only SLI as its just a bit of fun that I found it had a benchmark I don't take score serious im just happy the game runs ok is all.

Kaapstad · 28 Oct 2013 at 16:39

almighty15 said:
No....Just No..... Running maxed out at 4k the 290X still beats the Nvidia cards, and beats them by some margin too.

Not in the benches I have seen.

Go on find me a bench where a 290X is running Skyrim with lots of mods @4k. I think they needed a Titan to measure the VRAM usage @5.5gb lol. I don't care what AMD say, the 290X is not a 4K card unless you want to reduce the settings.

almighty15 · 28 Oct 2013 at 16:47

Kaapstad said:
Not in the benches I have seen.

Go on find me a bench where a 290X is running Skyrim with lots of mods @4k. I think they needed a Titan to measure the VRAM usage @5.5gb lol. I don't care what AMD say, the 290X is not a 4K card unless you want to reduce the settings.

Titan is not a 4k card unless you want single digit frames....

Ultra HD 4K Summary
Amazingly, when the resolution is cranked up to Ultra HD resolutions like 3840x2160, the new Radeon R9 290X outperforms the GeForce GTX TITAN. We saw as much as a 23% performance jump over the much more expensive GeForce GTX TITAN. In all of the previous pages the R9 290X was in-between the GTX 780 and GTX TITAN, closer to TITAN, but at Ultra HD 4K it just owns the GeForce GTX TITAN.

To think Titan is a better 4k card then the 290X is quite frankly, silly... EVERY review that tests 4k shows that the 290X hammers both the 780 and Titan at 4k.

Kaapstad · 28 Oct 2013 at 17:10

almighty15 said:
Titan is not a 4k card unless you want single digit frames....

To think Titan is a better 4k card then the 290X is quite frankly, silly... EVERY review that tests 4k shows that the 290X hammers both the 780 and Titan at 4k.

I think my 4 Titans will do a bit better than single digit frames lol. At 4K you do not use single cards, you should be looking to use 3 or 4 cards if you want to turn the settings right up to max. Having said that you can not do this if your cards do not have enough VRAM, 4gb is not enough.

I think you also need to be more balanced in your views, defending AMD come what may only weakens your point of view.

There are reviews out there where the Titan comes out on top @4K, go and find them.

almighty15 · 28 Oct 2013 at 17:31

Kaapstad said:
I think my 4 Titans will do a bit better than single digit frames lol. At 4K you do not use single cards, you should be looking to use 3 or 4 cards if you want to turn the settings right up to max. Having said that you can not do this if your cards do not have enough VRAM, 4gb is not enough.

I think you also need to be more balanced in your views, defending AMD come what may only weakens your point of view.

There are reviews out there where the Titan comes out on top @4K, go and find them.

And if you speak to 8 pack he'll tell you Titan scales like ass after 3 cards where as the AMD don't......

So 4x 290X will be better due to superior fill rate and GPU scaling...

Unless you know better then 8 pack?

And I would hardly call modding the heck out of a game and cherry picking a fair comparison would you? And I would wait to see if we don't get any 8Gb 290X's..... What will your 6Gb over priced Titans do then?

spankingtexan · 28 Oct 2013 at 17:40

I think the 290x will perform a little better when they get custom cooling, mature drivers but I still think this card is up there with the 780's and Titans and it's not where the AMD boys really want it to be, they seem to think it's a Titan killer but really, it isn't.

Here's yet another reviewer who claims 290X just doesn't kill Titan or even 780's.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Vz7XWUBwBQ

I suppose we also have to ignore TTL and Linus? I don't think so.

Kaapstad · 28 Oct 2013 at 17:41

almighty15 said:
And if you speak to 8 pack he'll tell you Titan scales like ass after 3 cards where as the AMD don't......

So 4x 290X will be better due to superior fill rate and GPU scaling...

Unless you know better then 8 pack?

Perhaps you can give me a list of the games he has tested the scaling on lol.

8 Pack only plays one game it's called Overvolting Extreme !!!