*** Battlefield 1 ***
- Thread starter TonyTurbo78
- Start date
Associate
- Joined
- 28 May 2008
- Posts
- 132
Get to work you soft arses!
- Joined
- 26 Sep 2013
- Posts
- 10,756
- Location
- West End, Southampton
I been to work, started at 6:30 finished already due to only having 3 of my parts for my jobs today in the depot.
Associate
- Joined
- 28 May 2008
- Posts
- 132
Fair enough, hoping to head home around midday myself!
In customise soldier? It's a known issue, your progress/unlocks in a match shouldn't be affected though.
- Joined
- 26 Sep 2013
- Posts
- 10,756
- Location
- West End, Southampton
Any1 joining me and hazard today?
Soldato
- Joined
- 18 May 2010
- Posts
- 23,004
- Location
- London
So the rumour is that the next BF is going to be called BF V and be a WW2 shooter. No surprise there then.
Soldato
- Joined
- 13 Jun 2011
- Posts
- 6,053
Wonder if it will have lazer beam weapons and when everyone complains it will be “in the spirit of ww2” not an actual representation
Soldato
- Joined
- 16 Feb 2010
- Posts
- 5,223
- Location
- North East England
I thought they were re-making BF:Vietnam ! Got all excited with Ride of the Valkyries playing in my head.
I personally would like to see a BF during the Napolionic wars.
Where you have available muskets, that are basically terrible, slow rate of fire and very inaccurate - would would then put more of emphasis on close combat, calvary engagements and use of artillery.
Think it would make a really interesting change to most other battlefield games and make it focus a little more on strategy rather than point and click skills. Maybe suit someone more that is past their gaming prime, shall we say
I like BF1 because the weapons are more basic than the modern ones, but I feel even in that game some of them are a little over the top for the period, most soldiers would just be armed with basic pattern rifles.
Where you have available muskets, that are basically terrible, slow rate of fire and very inaccurate - would would then put more of emphasis on close combat, calvary engagements and use of artillery.
Think it would make a really interesting change to most other battlefield games and make it focus a little more on strategy rather than point and click skills. Maybe suit someone more that is past their gaming prime, shall we say
I like BF1 because the weapons are more basic than the modern ones, but I feel even in that game some of them are a little over the top for the period, most soldiers would just be armed with basic pattern rifles.
Soldato
- Joined
- 8 Jan 2007
- Posts
- 3,315
- Location
- Cognac, France
I can't see many people enjoying the 5 minute reload to put gunpowder in the musket then a metal ball before firing and hitting nothing.
Funny, It's normally the Benny Hill theme that runs though my head while playing BF
The South Essex Regiment could shoot 4 shots per minute using the bite, pour, spit, tap & fire method.
The French could only manage 3, so already it's imbalanced and OP.
I personally would like to see a BF during the Napolionic wars.
Where you have available muskets, that are basically terrible, slow rate of fire and very inaccurate - would would then put more of emphasis on close combat, calvary engagements and use of artillery.
Think it would make a really interesting change to most other battlefield games and make it focus a little more on strategy rather than point and click skills. Maybe suit someone more that is past their gaming prime, shall we say
I like BF1 because the weapons are more basic than the modern ones, but I feel even in that game some of them are a little over the top for the period, most soldiers would just be armed with basic pattern rifles.
Isnt that game Holdfast almost exactly that?
But who had the largest first shot spread multiplier and visual recoil?
Not needed as after 3 volleys and you won't be able to see the enemy for the smoke.