• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Benchmarking my Ryzen 1700X

SiDeards73 said:
Wait you said 5.4? Lol :) what's it get in cinebench at 5.2?

Pretty sure that 1700x won't be far behind if at all in multi.
Click to expand...
if you re read mate i said 1663 on cinebench at 5.1 and does 1792 at 5.4 , done 3 tests at 5.2 one did 1694 , 1713 and 1702 so . and yeah this anhilates my 1700x

probably could run 5.4 daily if i was happy with temps but 5.2 is immense temp wise sub 30s idle 60s loaded so
 
marcus_667 said:
if you re read mate i said 1663 on cinebench at 5.1 and does 1792 at 5.4 , done 3 tests at 5.2 one did 1694 , 1713 and 1702 so . and yeah this anhilates my 1700x

probably could run 5.4 daily if i was happy with temps but 5.2 is immense temp wise sub 30s idle 60s loaded so
Click to expand...

Don't worry about the anti-Intel brigade.

All CPUs will bench higher. I had my 2600k at 5.2 for a quick bench. Struggling to do 5ghz daily without high volts (1.42ish been a while)
 
koooowweeee said:
Don't worry about the anti-Intel brigade.

All CPUs will bench higher. I had my 2600k at 5.2 for a quick bench. Struggling to do 5ghz daily without high volts (1.42ish been a while)
Click to expand...

Thing is i dont hate amd either just 1700x didnt work for me i tried for a month got fedup and went back to intel waiting for 3xxx cpus to come
 
marcus_667 said:
runs 5.2 daily since october last year mate stomps my 1700x i had in everything
Click to expand...
marcus_667 said:
if you re read mate i said 1663 on cinebench at 5.1 and does 1792 at 5.4 , done 3 tests at 5.2 one did 1694 , 1713 and 1702 so . and yeah this anhilates my 1700x

probably could run 5.4 daily if i was happy with temps but 5.2 is immense temp wise sub 30s idle 60s loaded so
Click to expand...

Nah...................not that impressed to be honest. If that Annihilates your 1700X...................then my pecker is a bloater :D

29vnmhd.jpg
 
kitfit1 said:
Nah...................not that impressed to be honest. If that Annihilates your 1700X...................then my pecker is a bloater :D
Click to expand...

nice cinebench score :) , ryzen do seem to be cinebench kings like , i think i got unlucky with my 1700x as it sucked the proverbial in terms of what i wanted to do with it maybe platform immaturity or what ever you wanna call it , have said ill revisit it IF zen 2 ipc gets on par
 
I said Ryzen, not Zen :) deliberately, a lot of people reading this don't know what Zen is, all they know is what's written on the box, that's Ryzen, they know Ryzen 1000 series is the old one and Ryen 2000 the new one, maybe i should say that instead of ryzen 1 and 2.

Ryzen 2000 has higher IPC than Ryzen 1000, 1800X vs 2700X
 
humbug said:
I said Ryzen, not Zen :) deliberately, a lot of people reading this don't know what Zen is, all they know is what's written on the box, that's Ryzen, they know Ryzen 1000 series is the old one and Ryen 2000 the new one, maybe i should say that instead of ryzen 1 and 2.

Ryzen 2000 has higher IPC than Ryzen 1000, 1800X vs 2700X
Click to expand...

Has there been any decent testing done on those CPU's at the same clocks?
 
marcus_667 said:
nice cinebench score :) , ryzen do seem to be cinebench kings like , i think i got unlucky with my 1700x as it sucked the proverbial in terms of what i wanted to do with it maybe platform immaturity or what ever you wanna call it , have said ill revisit it IF zen 2 ipc gets on par
Click to expand...

I have no doubt at all you saved your 1792 score at 5.4Ghz ? post it up then............................i know i would :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom