The job title is invented by the org. In India a lot of junior folk are called senior executives for example.I think 28 for a VP feels a bit soon.
Last edited:
The job title is invented by the org. In India a lot of junior folk are called senior executives for example.I think 28 for a VP feels a bit soon.
It's a widely used title in banking as you need mid level managers to be able to sign off on deals etc.I think 28 for a VP feels a bit soon.
I was referring to professional accountants not investment bankers, two completely different things.Senior? That's entry-level/graduate pay at banks in London:
Directors can be into the several hundred k or millions and CFOs are almost certainly into the millions (or even tens of millions in a few cases at very large companies).
I was referring to professional accountants not investment bankers, two completely different things.
The job title is invented by the org. In India a lot of junior folk are called senior executives for example.
I've worked for a company like this, when I first started there I was amazed to be surrounded by so many young directors and executives and all manner of fancy names, until one day I clocked that "Executive Director of International Business Development" was literally just a salesman for other countries.
Titles like that mean nothing nowadays, no substance at all
I've worked at several companies where every other person was a Vice President and there were hundreds of "Directors". It was just ridiculous.I've worked for a company like this, when I first started there I was amazed to be surrounded by so many young directors and executives and all manner of fancy names, until one day I clocked that "Executive Director of International Business Development" was literally just a salesman for other countries.
Titles like that mean nothing nowadays, no substance at all
It's a widely used title in banking as you need mid level managers to be able to sign off on deals etc.
Very different level to a VP in industry.
Coincidentally head of in India is massively significant and normally quite senior.One of my oldest friend, since we were kids is quite high up in his career. We catch up once a year roughly around Christmas or friend’s wedding and about 5 years ago I asked him what his job title was, “Are you a VP?” I said.
“Ray, I have Vice Presidents working for me.” It was when I realised VP means nothing at all.
His job title doesn’t have the word Director in it , just “Head of XYZ” Department, but is actually on the board.
List makes no sense at all, any very good trade would be earning that and more. Brickies are getting over a pound a brick, and 1.60 a block at the moment.
I think you're obsessed with what other people earn. Weird.What do people think?
The 'Big 4' these days are classed as 'Professional Service Firms' rather then just auditors as they've traditionally been know for. For example the company I work for hired people from PWC to work as Pension Actuaries for 6 six months that allowed our existing staff to work on a separate project.EY partner pay in UK hits £803,000 as consultants drive profit boost
Accountancy firm moves to address near-stagnant salaries at entry levelwww.ft.com
Think senior professional accountants probably make more than you think
I've worked for a company like this, when I first started there I was amazed to be surrounded by so many young directors and executives and all manner of fancy names, until one day I clocked that "Executive Director of International Business Development" was literally just a salesman for other countries.
Titles like that mean nothing nowadays, no substance at all
Big 4 partners make up something like 0.3% of all qualified accountants in the UK so that is not very representative!
EY partner pay in UK hits £803,000 as consultants drive profit boost
Accountancy firm moves to address near-stagnant salaries at entry levelwww.ft.com
Think senior professional accountants probably make more than you think
Anyone decently competent in IT at an engineering level in London should be on ~90-125k now without even having any direct reports.Anything in IT within 150 miles of London was getting 50k a year ten years ago. I'm thinking the numbers are low.
Anyone decently competent in IT at an engineering level in London now should be on 90-125k now without even having any direct reports.