Billionaires pay "0% - 0.5% tax" report finds - Suggests 2% minimum tax.

I'm not sure the local toy shop which closed down would've invested money into R&D to design Alexa or a Kindle; the economic activity created by Amazon is almost incalculable.

Yes a very good point - but then that's not directly related to the owner's wealth is it? They're also devices which are in part designed to tie you to that ecosystem, e.g. almost part of marketing.

They're destroyed because they've been improved upon.

Depends how you define "improved".

Everyone talks about the good old days when they went to the butcher for their meat, the fishmonger for their fish, grocer for their veg, baker for their bread. And yet when supermarkets came about, with everything in one place, the individual shops went out of business. Why? Because people voted with their feet, of course they did, it's far more convenient. It's the same with shops. The economy, and society is evolutionary, nothing lasts forever. I'm sure in 100 years time amazon will either have evolved into something different or have gone bust because it stubbornly refused to move with the times.

Is the supermarket more convenient (and cheaper) than having to go to 5-6 different shops for your groceries? Absolutely.
Is the quality of produce anywhere near what you could get otherwise? Not even close.
Do most people care about the first point more than the second? Sadly yes :(

The other danger is giving a single entity too much "power".

Run your business at a loss or barely any profit. Aggressively destroy any competition (due to aforementioned running at a loss). Now bump all your prices up - what are your customers going to do, shop at the competition which you've destroyed?
 
i did AS economics for 1 term me i did, i'm a regular business guru.
I have absolutely zero economics qualifications :D I'll drop out.

But I hope I have added a bit of flavour, I just think some people have an ingrained skepticism (maybe even hatred) of business owners. My late beloved father was like that. It's interesting that it seems to be a form of prejudice that is pervasive and seems to be acceptable. All of the major parties, all they care about now is the economy, and big businesses boost the economy. That is all that matters to the people that rule us. So even if that prejudice is wide spread through the electorate, the powers that be will pander to the business owners.

Ultimately I think the majority of issues with the modern economy are sustainability (environment) and declining birth rates, our economy and welfare system (and most western ones) is predicated on growing populations. That is slowing, and someone needs to come up with a solution for that.
 
Last edited:
Amazon pays their warehouse staff at least £11.80 an hour according to their job site, which is more than £1.40 over the minimum wage for a 23 year old, £21.5k @ 35 hours per week. Is that a poor wage for a job with no requirements in terms of qualifications?
There is more to job quality than just pay, their working conditions are grim, I'd sooner work for less elsewhere.

And I am fully aware I am a hypocrite, but for now, using Amazon saves me money, and my wallet-protest instead goes against all things Nestle (and they have their dirty fingers in SO many products).
 
Its difficult at individual state level since they can just move it elsewhere
If all the states where people would want to store wealth cooperated it would change the picture.

Say the only places you could hold wealth were Russia, South america, somalia etc you would be far less likely to want to store all your wealth there, than declare it and hold it in the UK.

People often talk about the tax havens. Most of the tax havens fall under the protection of one of the major players globally.

Imagine if 50% of the worlds wealth was stored in a Caribbean tax haven. They would require a bonkers armed forces else someone could just trot in and perform a coup.
 
There is more to job quality than just pay, their working conditions are grim, I'd sooner work for less elsewhere.

And I am fully aware I am a hypocrite, but for now, using Amazon saves me money, and my wallet-protest instead goes against all things Nestle (and they have their dirty fingers in SO many products).

Have you worked there? Is it worse than most jobs that are "unskilled"? I would argue it's probably better than a lot. I have friends who work in warehouses and do similar work, Amazon absolutely would not be one of the worst places to work if you're doing that kind of labour.
 
They're destroyed because they've been improved upon.

Everyone talks about the good old days when they went to the butcher for their meat, the fishmonger for their fish, grocer for their veg, baker for their bread. And yet when supermarkets came about, with everything in one place, the individual shops went out of business. Why? Because people voted with their feet, of course they did, it's far more convenient. It's the same with shops. The economy, and society is evolutionary, nothing lasts forever. I'm sure in 100 years time amazon will either have evolved into something different or have gone bust because it stubbornly refused to move with the times.

I'm sure there's lots of hypocrites on here who will say amazon destroyed loads of local shops but will then order all their stuff online. Ultimately people vote with their feet, they have been and they will continue to.

Yes but public also want (they should) these places taxed.

And that's the job of the state/world.

I your world it would seem like most people would end up dead if they aren't wealthy enough?
How we benefits, health care, etc of we let mega corps get off easy with lack of tax?
Where else do we get it from?

This problem is happening now. Right in front of us. There's no where left to get money from. Certainly, the average Joe doesn't have much left. Should we raise tax on Payee?

If we aren't going to increase tax on wealth... You have to be happy to let the general standard of living decline. Because that's what's going to happen.

Money trickles up not down.
 
What is needed is a loan tax. With an associated rebate on repayment, which is void upon death.

As far as I understand it, many billionaires don't pay tax because they don't take a salary. Instead, what happens is they use on loans guaranteed by the assets they own, which are repaid on their death. Having the aforementioned tax would go a long way to stopping that sort of behaviour.
 
Conversely, if you needed a loaf of bread and you went to the bakers to get it, there's only so many things that you can be tempted to buy.
Donuts, slices, cakes, rolls. Might pop to the butcher on the way, and the fish monger and Woolworths and Wilkinsons as well.

Might treat myself to some penny sweets as well. None of this Harribo nonsense.
 
Last edited:
Donuts, slices, cakes, rolls. Might pop to the butcher on the way, and the fish monger and Woolworths and Wilkinsons as well.

Might treat myself to some penny sweets as well. None of this Harribo nonsense.
Man popping into Woolworths for pick n mix before going to the pictures. Those were the days.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom