Bomb Iran?

Westyfield2 said:
As I understand it:

The Prime Minister is elected (well apart from Gordon Brown ;)) and runs the country. The Monarch has the power to stop the Prime Minister and do whatever they feel like - it's their country afterall. But this power is never used.
Click to expand...

You misunderstand then.
The prime minister is not elected. The party is elected and as such Gordon brown is elected.
 
drunkenmaster said:
The problem is that Iran now has an empty, completely useless country sitting next door that the world is slowly pulling out of. Essentially, once the last troops are out it will be a terrorist haven, with Iran close by being able to fund and arm terrorists, and yes they most certainly have the option of creating dirty bombs, slipping them out to terrorist cells and having terrorists attack anyone while denying responsibility and publically condeming any attacks.
Click to expand...
Good thing that dirty bombs are completely useless and the actual conventional explosives in them are far more dangerous than the radioactive material.

ultra left wing, ultra anti war Obama
Click to expand...
He's to the right of the Tories. In what world is that left wing?
 
I know one thing, if they started calling people up to invade Iran, they can put me in Prison as their is NO WAY I'm fighting some stupid invasion war.

IF UK was getting attacked thats a different story thats called defending your country.
 
Last edited:
Nelly said:
I know one thing, if they started calling people up to invade Iran, they can put me in Prison as their is NO WAY I'm fighting some stupid invasion war.
Click to expand...

The UK does not "call peope up".


Oh and "defending your country", if Iran were proved to have an intent to use nuclear weapons, wouldn't you like to defend THE WORLD? or does it not count unless some dirty foreigner steps foot on old blighty?
 
Fenris said:
The UK does not "call peope up".


Oh and "defending your country", if Iran were proved to have an intent to use nuclear weapons, wouldn't you like to defend THE WORLD? or does it not count unless some dirty foreigner steps foot on old blighty?
Click to expand...

they have done it in the past, they can do it in the future.
 
Bomb Iran?

Yeah you got the green light for that one. In fact lets just bomb the lot from left to right Iraq, Iran, and let us not forget Afghanistan.
 
Fenris said:
Oh and "defending your country", if Iran were proved to have an intent to use nuclear weapons, wouldn't you like to defend THE WORLD? or does it not count unless some dirty foreigner steps foot on old blighty?
Click to expand...
Let Israel deal with it, it's them who should be worried as Iran's leader said he would like to wipe Israel of the face of the map.
drew64 said:
we also burnt people at the stake in the past.

conscription would only be used in extreme emergencies
Click to expand...
Well we seem to call up reserves a lot, already have troops in Afghanistan I dont think we could handle a full scale war with a country like Iran, UK is just too weak.

If it was just UK vs Iran then we would get crapped all over because we arent big enough.

If anything needs to be done it shouldnt have to rely on the UK/U.S all the time, should involve France, Germany, Israel, Spain etc etc. on an even scale i.e. same amount of troops.
 
Last edited:
Fenris said:
Oh and "defending your country", if Iran were proved to have an intent to use nuclear weapons, wouldn't you like to defend THE WORLD?
Click to expand...

So you are suggesting that because Iran has weapons, it will automatically use them against Britain (or the World)?

The FACT of the matter is that USA is the country which has has a proven track record of using weapons of mass destruction. If you want to "defend the WORLD", then the best thing you can do is take arms against the USA.

To attack a country before they have committed a crime is totally wrong. Its as wrong as punishing a human being for a crime they have yet to commit (or might commit). Or would you prefer that people be imprisoned before they have actually been found guilty of a crime?
 
sunama said:
So you are suggesting that because Iran has weapons, it will automatically use them against Britain (or the World)?
Click to expand...

Read my post again (all of it this time).

Fenris said:
if Iran were proved to have an intent to use nuclear weapons
Click to expand...

That bit specificaly.

But to comment on your point, what would you prefer, that they fire a nuclear weapon at a city and kill millions of people first?
 
Fenris said:
Read my post again (all of it this time).



That bit specificaly.

But to comment on your point, what would you prefer, that they fire a nuclear weapon at a city and kill millions of people first?
Click to expand...

have you forgotten what the US does to a country that doesnt want to trade in dollars.
 
full of sh** as usual. the onyl countries doin the attackin are american and britain.

they are the agrresors, when did iran attack us or threaten to attack us.

think for urselves ppl, dont listen to the bs spouted from the media and govt.

they are scare mongerers who always scare u into supportin one thing or another.
 
“Since the enemy has atomic facilities, Islamic countries must be armed with the same capacity”
Ata'ollah Mohajerani, Iranian Vice President, Oct 1991



Will we bomb Iran? no.

Will Israel bomb Iran? yes

Will we publicly support Israel? no

Will Iran be able to retaliate? no

As it would involve breaching Iraq airspace / sovereignty which is basically under American protection thus they can’t respond in any shape or form. (reason for Iraq invasion quite possibly)

Even in the event the launch missiles they will have to travel past American patriot batteries before they reach even Israel patriot batteries.

Will the west or Israel ever make a ground based invasion of Iran?

No because Iran unlike the west can relay on conscription & nationalism as well as religion. The sheer number of men women & children Iran can press in to service & suicide squads would make any ground based invasion doomed to failure.

Can we bomb them back to the stone age ?

Yes but it would make a mockery of everything the free world stands for.

FACT – 70% of Iran’s population is under 30 aka fighting age. However this age group is more westernised & pro democratic.

However an invasion would push into open arms of the current extremist’s via national & Persian pride.

However as the current electrons show the Mullahs are losing there grip slowly & the want for democracy is growing. And if left to there own devises Iran will end up a modern pro western oil rich state but this will take time.

Will Iran in its current state be allowed to develop nukes ? no.

Will we hear about it ? no it will be dealt with….. how we will never know….

By force ? yes may it be by airstrike or my insertion, as airstrikes is not possible at all of Iran’s atomic sites due to there intention proximity to hospitals of oil refineries e.g.

The Karaj Project

The Bandar Abbas Project


Will sanctions work?

Yes as the current Iranian nuclear program relays heavy on Russian, Chinese , German French & Belgian involvement. The last 3 I bet you’re surprised at but these sort of things are quite common.

For example the PSNI ( police service of northern Ireland ) is currently training the Libyan police despite much criticism.

Another example would be the CIA funding al Qaida during the soviet afghan war.

These things happen in the big nasty power play world we live in.

& lastly.

Will Iran have nukes? No for the above reason night night sleep well :D



& if you want to argue against my points please explain & justify your reasoning.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom