Uh no we are not.We are now at the point that Schools are a text book example of "inmates are running the asylum"..
You make it sound as if you can't already do that... voluntarily.This +1
We need to defund the BBC.
Last time I checked I couldn’t due to owning a television and the “unique way the BBC is funded”!You make it sound as if you can't already do that... voluntarily.
Last time I checked I couldn’t due to owning a television and the “unique way the BBC is funded”!
Not legally at least unless I’m willing to stop watching any terrestrial TV stations and take down my aerial.
Ie unique as in “pay us or we’ll threaten you with legal action”. Even most dictatorships don’t force you to pay directly for their state run propaganda!
You don’t need a TV Licence if you never watch live on any channel, TV service or streaming service, or use BBC iPlayer. This applies to watching on any device.
If you only do the following, you don’t need a licence:
Watch on demand or catch up programmes on services other than BBC iPlayer
Watch S4C programmes on demand
Stream, rent or buy movies from providers like Sky, Virgin Media, BT TV, Netflix, Amazon Prime, Disney Plus or Now TV
Watch DVDs or Blu-rays,
Play videos clips through services like YouTube or to play video games.
Same girl who likes Drake....just go check out some of Drakes lyrics.![]()
Call to remove Of Mice and Men from GCSE course
This Belfast student says racial slurs within the book leave her feeling uncomfortable in the classroom.www.bbc.co.uk
These people need to spend some time in a mental institution!
For goodness sake, where will it end?
Not doing English A level because of 'racist' slurs etc in a book!
The girls argument comes across as a bit weak
But what does a nearly 100 year old book teach modern kids? At some point a classic becomes more and more obsolete. It's just the nature of things.
Depends on several factors.Been saying this about Shakespeare for nigh on 42 years but the Shakespearean taliban are very powerful.
Depends on several factors.
Most of his works are plays and are designed to be delivered as such, by competent actors. Simply reading them isn't half as good.
Romeo and Juliet is nice enough, but does harp on quite a bit. King Lear is a right mission.
Hamlet, however, is bloody brilliant... and probably why Mad Mel was able to do such a good job in what is possibly his best ever role.
Fundamentalist? Just the opposite. Zafirelli/Gibson's version departs from all the traditional styles of portraying Hamlet as this dull, depressed, mopey ******.My point entirely, you people are scary and fundamentalists![]()