Bought undeclared Cat N car is there anything I can do?

So if he genuinely didn't know it was Cat N maybe the company who sold it to him should be liable?
Stop trying to push liability elsewhere!

Take some accountability for the situation. You didn't check, now you are annoyed.
You caused the situation - nobody forced you to buy the car, and it would appear nobody "actively" lied to you.

So it's all your own doing I'm afraid - the situation, the way you are feeling now.... just chalk it up to experience and move on.
 
The call after he sold it? What relevance does that have? The contract was already established and completed by that point.

That’s not how consumer law works; he’s in breach of contract, and is fully entitled to take him to court, even if it is a private sale.

Having read the thread, OP has made some other critical errors that would go against him in a court of law, however.
 
That’s not how consumer law works; he’s in breach of contract, and is fully entitled to take him to court, even if it is a private sale.

Having read the thread, OP has made some other critical errors that would go against him in a court of law, however.

He'd stand zero chance.
 
That’s not how consumer law works; he’s in breach of contract, and is fully entitled to take him to court, even if it is a private sale.

Having read the thread, OP has made some other critical errors that would go against him in a court of law, however.
What contract is breached? I think the OP is going to have a tough time proving deliberate misrepresentation.
 
That’s not how consumer law works; he’s in breach of contract, and is fully entitled to take him to court, even if it is a private sale.
How is he?

The bloke says he didn't know about an accident repair that occurred 3 months before his ownership. The OP has nothing to prove he did know.

What's he going to take him to court for, not being psychic?
 
That’s not how consumer law works; he’s in breach of contract, and is fully entitled to take him to court, even if it is a private sale.

Having read the thread, OP has made some other critical errors that would go against him in a court of law, however.
It was Cat N'd before the seller bought it, so his claim in the recorded call could well be complete truth. Good luck proving otherwise.
 
People like OP are the reason I cba with private sales. Blind buys car then demands money off/back when something isn't quite right.

You have ample opportunity to do your homework and check the car over. If he lives 1 street away it's not worth the aggro trying to do someone over so close to home.
 
Unless it was explicitly sold as not a Cat N, etc. I doubt you have any comeback here. It is worth doing the HPI check as often you get some protection against it being wrong then for the sake of a few quid.
Any Cat x cars have to be advertised as such. If the seller doesn't play ball it is a small claim for at least the difference in value. It is OK to drive a Cat N as long as it has a current MoT. Do you have the sellers advert details?
Andi.
 
I've seen countless threads on here and Pistonheads about people who have sold a car privately and then had the buyer contact them asking for redress because of $reasons. The general consensus in every case was to ignore the buyer, or tell them to jog on.

The same applies in this case. You didn't do your homework properly. Accept the annoyance and chalk it up to experience. You have, for all intents and purposes, no comeback. It's simply not worth the effort and mental anguish.
 
Back
Top Bottom