Caporegime
The security forces, republicans and loyalists all had their part to play in atrocities commited over here, some people tend to harbour grievances for a long time, and pass them on to the next generation.
Absolutely, I completely agree. But for the families of the victims involved in some of the Irish tragedies, it doesn't bring them back. They'll still be angry at the people/country/organisation behind the attacks, just like British families affected in the attacks you mentioned.
Absolutely, I completely agree. But for the families of the victims involved in some of the Irish tragedies, it doesn't bring them back. They'll still be angry at the people/country/organisation behind the attacks, just like British families affected in the attacks you mentioned.
I was just trying to point out that the statement "get over it" that's bandied around so often in these discussions, won't apply to certain for quite some time.
No, it doesn't. LA Galaxy are an American 'football' team, but there isn't an 'American League' as that would cover the whole of North and South America. They are part of the USA 'Soccer' League. Barcelona are a European team, but there isn't a 'European league
LA Galaxy are a MLS soccer club, who play within a nationally recognised league which is affiliated to CONCACAF association so they are both American as in the commonly used description for the United States (you wouldn't refer to a Brazilian as an American would you) and are associated to the wider North and Central American/Caribbean association which is in turn associated to FIFA.
Barcelona are a Spanish team that compete in Europe, again there is a European league as there is also a European Association UEFA.
Britain does not have an association, neither is it recognised as a single entity in regards to association football, thus there are no British Football teams, they are designated by the FA of the country in which they are registered to.
In Celtic's case that is Scotland.
Name me one player who has played for Great Britain in association football....
Sean Connery is a Scottish actor right? Scotland has no international recognition as a sovereign nation but it is still acceptable to call Shir Shean a Scot. He is Scottish AND British.
Celtic is a British football club even though there is no British FA. Celtic are a British AND and a Scottish football club.
Lol. Just lol.
So the fact that, according to the ONS, Scotland is a net economic burden on the UK and net tax consumer means nothing? Do me a favour. In some areas of Scotland over 70% of people are employed directly by the public sector.
I don't think you have any idea, pal.
heophany said:they're clueless to the fact that their economy wouldn't be self-sufficient.
Britain and it's constituent parts are recognised as a union and individual countries, there is no such recognition for association football.
Celtic have no affiliation to the other Countries in the Union whatsoever, they are only affiliated with the Scottish FA. This makes them a Scottish and not a British club.
Simply put, there is no recognition of a single entity called Britain (or more accurately the UK) in international association football.
Can you get a Scottish passport?
FIFA don't recognise Britain as an affiliate association - but that wasn't what we were talking about. Celtic can be described as a Scottish club OR a British club OR a European club.
You are arguing the case for the sake of sematics. The point stands, Glasgow Celtic are a Scottish football team. Since Scotland is part of Great Britain, Celtic are also a British football team, just like any other British football team, whether they play in the English, Scottish, Welsh or Northern Irish leagues.
It isn't a British football team when in Britain.
How hard is this to comprehend?
Nope. Semantics or not, they are not British, they are only recognised officially as being members of their respective Football Associations and should be referred to as such.
By your logic, they are British because Scotland is in Britain, thus they are European because they are in Britain which is in Europe, they must also belong to the world as Europe is but a continent and ultimately Celtic are universal as everything resides within the known Universe.
Which is daft, Celtic is a Scottish football team simply because there is no recognition of a British entity in football.
Otherwise the Scottish Parliament is actually the British Parliament as Scotland is in Britain, that is clearly ludicrous, as is saying Celtic are British.
It isn't a British football team when in Britain.
How hard is this to comprehend?
Ireland isn't in Britain.
Can you get a Scottish passport?
FIFA don't recognise Britain as an affiliate association - but that wasn't what we were talking about. Celtic can be described as a Scottish club OR a British club OR a European club.
Yes it is. Why is this so hard to understand?
Have you never seen a newspaper refer to a champions league game between a scottish team and an english team as a "Battle of Britain"?
Ireland isn't in Britain.