Soldato
- Joined
- 12 Sep 2007
- Posts
- 2,988
Somehow I don't think that would work lol.
Also, Eero is a good product. If you're having range issues then it's likely due to where you are positioning them, or the construction of the walls. Simply changing to another product that also sets legally compliant radio power levels won't fix range issues.
You need to run some wires out of that cupboard and plug in some access points to them.For a while now I've been having a bit of a nightmare with my BT SH2 Wifi.
I think the best fix might be an aftermarket router or something like those wifi discs (you can't split the bands on the BT ones either apparently), but I'm not sure how well the aftermarket ones work across different ISPs as I may be moving to Toob when they finally roll out the 1Gbs synchronous service.
- Some of my devices only work on 2.4Ghz (Solar inverter and Aircon wifi dongles). I can't split the bands with the hub so I have to disable 5Ghz, once they connect I can re-enable 5Ghz but it seems that being re-enabled it doesn't use it fully.
- This means if I ever restart the router or if BT push out an update, I have to repeat this fix, and it's sort of temperamental.
- My general Wifi performance is awful. I have 900Mbps downstream on my connection when wired in, but my Wifi devices like my phone and my work laptop seem to get very poor Wifi performance, if the internet is even working at all. I've seen speed test results on wifi at less than 1Mbps.
- The house is an L-shape and the router is located in the understairs cupboard, so it's central to the house but it's also not ideally positioned for signal, although not much I can do about it.
- If I ignore the "fix" for the 2.4Ghz devices and just boot it up with 5Ghz enabled, then it generally seems to work a lot better, but if the devices auto-switch to 2.4Ghz they slow down again, and because I can't split the bands I can't force it to work on 5Ghz or 2.4Ghz for different things.
Any other ideas welcome
Doesn't really add up though.Funny reading this in a strange way then reading the article then the comments, then came across this one.
"Every time speed increases are on the horizon you get the same people saying people don’t need it, we’d still be on dialup if it was up to them.
Do not impose your lack of ability to utilise things on to others please."
You need to run some wires out of that cupboard and plug in some access points to them.
That is the only real solution, particularly in an L shape house. You really need one access point in each side of the house.
If you have access to an external wall and power in the loft it’s pretty simple.
Tac an outdoor rated Ethernet cable up the outside wall (better still, hide it behind a gutter down pipe), plug it into a POE switch in the loft. From there connect that to 2 U6 lites from Ubiquiti (or the TP-link equivalent) and mount them on the ceilings in each side of the “L”.
If you don’t have power in the loft, you may have to run 2 cables and run the POE switch in the under stairs cupboard.
If you don’t have access to an external wall you could try doing similar inside and use something like two U6 Mesh but hiding the cable runs can be difficult.
Disable WiFi on the BT hub and put in place some proper access points. As you already have the Ethernet in place it’s really quite easy to install them.I have at least 1 regular power socket and ethernet in my loft-space, so in theory I could use that, and some tactical drilling into my upstairs ceiling.
I guess my choices are:
- Add an access point just for the 2.4Ghz devices, only have 5Ghz enabled on the BT hub.
- Do the opposite, 5Ghz on access point, 2.4Ghz only on BT hub.
- Entirely disable Wifi on the BT hub and add an access point that does both.
- Add a new router that can do band splitting but will potentially suffer the same issues, poor signal/connectivity. May work if the signal it puts out is much better than the default BT hub one though, house isn't that big, I don't need super-fast wifi everywhere, getting 50-100mbps would be fine.
Disable WiFi on the BT hub and put in place some proper access points. As you already have the Ethernet in place it’s really quite easy to install them.
Two Ubiquiti U6 lites and a Netgear POE switch should be under £300.
The Ubiquiti access points are highly configurable but also good out the box.
By having one seamless network across the APs, your devices can roam from one to the other depending on which had the best signal.
Edit: I should add that I have 1 older Ubiquiti AP mounted on my landing ceiling and it cover a 4 bed house no problem. Although it’s square and not L shaped.
I may struggle with power/cable runs for one downstairs. If 1 on upstairs ceiling covers it well that might be a better fit. It can't really be worse than the current BT hub performance to be fair.
Most of my devices are hard-wired in, including all of the AV kit in the lounge downstairs, so it's mainly to get better signal to my phone when around the house, and my work laptop (upstairs office room).
That U6 Lite doesn't allow a regular power feed it appears to only operate over POE, maybe something similar to this but using a regular power socket option instead?
Alternatively some sort of mesh network thing? I do have some spare power sockets in the central bits upstairs and downstairs, it doesn't need to be amazing as a solution but repeating the current network from more than one place would go a fair way.
snip
I wouldn’t bother buying anything to replace the BT SH under the stairs as what ever signal it gives out will be hampered. You might as well just turn off WiFi and let it continue to do the routing duties. Then spend your money on dedicated WiFi access points out in the house.