but this is one of many and they would have the opportunity to attract millions of members from everywhere
Regardless it would never create enough revenue given that one film can cost £10.
People would still want it free.
but this is one of many and they would have the opportunity to attract millions of members from everywhere
Exactly, for a tenner an hour I will allow anyone to use my garage and my £3 Asda microphone, millions of pounds of money wasted on Auto tune saved in a minute.On the topic of music piracy - since when did bands make their money from album sales anyway? It's always been from touring (gigs) and merchandising. It's only because of greedy music labels that we have an absurd price of around £10 per album, and then they have the nerve to pretend that the problem isn't them, but their customers?
Regardless it would never create enough revenue given that one film can cost £10.
People would still want it free.
You and I both know that legitimate users will eventually suffer from the actions taken from actions against pirates, I can't imagine it will be long till Vpn providers will start getting blocked.
On the topic of music piracy - since when did bands make their money from album sales anyway? It's always been from touring (gigs) and merchandising. It's only because of greedy music labels that we have an absurd price of around £10 per album, and then they have the nerve to pretend that the problem isn't them, but their customers?
You can't staff an army of neck-bearded cheap scates, points to the louise boat. Say what you like, tell me when you have got a plan that makes internet censorship easier. What are you going to do and how do you stop encrypted traffic? There is no possible design off the of my head that will even remotely make it possible for widespread internet censorship, p2p communications will always need to exist and encrypted forms obviously can't be censored.I suspect that if there had there been the foresight of the scale of this problem, there would have been much tighter regulation of the internet from day 1 and we would never have got to this point.
to me, whilst not overly palatable, that in itself is a reasonable justification for imposing restrictions. the fact industry organisations and governments have taken so long to act does not in itself make their actions wrong.
I am sure there will be legitimate sites to support legitimate users
They're too fixated on the individual prices of things. They are the type of people who think lowering their prices will definitely result in less income, while ignoring the fact that the lower a price, the more people are likely to buy. It's one of the many reasons that's doing nVidia in really.
You can't staff an army of neck-bearded cheap scates, points to the louise boat. Say what you like, tell me when you have got a plan that makes internet censorship easier. What are you going to do and how do you stop encrypted traffic? There is no possible design off the of my head that will even remotely make it possible for widespread internet censorship, p2p communications will always need to exist and encrypted forms obviously can't be censored.
Whether or not it makes them profit directly it contributes towards covering their costs at least.
How is £10 an absurd price for something that can give you 50+ years of entertainment?
Don't make them out to be 'just scrapping by', they're minted. Between recording, editing and producing CDs they would still be minted if they charged £1 per album.
Who are they? Mainstream pop acts?
For any band, mainstream or otherwise, £1 an album is highly unlikely to cover their costs.
LOL BT who uses bt anyway?
http://www.amazon.com/Against-Intellectual-Property-Stephan-Kinsella/dp/B001DTHFWS book is available online for free.
There is a massive argument against IP and i do not think that most people that argue the case for IP have ever even considered the argument. They are just loud mouth people that that like government enabled monopolies. Their product sucks so much that they have to get legislation from the government to prevent people from making it better.
Lol worthy, ip ensures research and development, not hinders.
Who's going to forkout the estimated $1.3billion cost per successful drug development, when others could just take the drug and sale it with no cost of research and testing.
LOL BT who uses bt anyway?
Intellectual property holds back innovation and enables the larger companies to retain monopolies as they have more money to pay off the patent office. Some inventors have spent years trying to get patents. While some corporations register several every month.
If everyone can copy other peoples inventions then the value of the invention comes from is the ability of the inventor to make it available at a reasonable price to the consumer. What is an invention that no one ever uses?
Unfortunately with the current laws drug development is often hindered by patents, varying isomers of the same drug are patented so that companies can keep bringing out the same drug over and over again, and many different drugs in the same class with virtually identical effects are developed as opposed to developing novel drugs.