Budget video editing build

Or £1200 for an entirely new build, though looking at prices for high end gpu's that would take a big chunk of the funds.

Factoring in savings (black Friday, etc) from other site, what could this get me for a new build?
I'd usually suggest an AM5 build, but since it is productivity-oriented I went with the 12700K instead:

My basket at OcUK:

Total: £1,199.87 (includes delivery: £11.98)​
 
I currently have a small NVMe m.2 drive for windows and a 1tb SSD for storage, so was thinking of similar, maybe upping capacity a bit or adding another SSD in the future, but also adding a much larger hdd for storage only, hence needing a bigger case.

So i'd use the SSD for working from in resolve and the hdd for backing up older files and storage.

Or is there another avenue to venture down now :)

Great, sounds like a good idea.

If you want to make use of mezzanine workflows (proxy workflows) then that 1tb won’t go far, but is a good start. I’m a big fan of Windows Storage Spaces for working drives, which you could use to add another drive to the 1tb in the future.
 


That's amazing, thanks Tetras, this gives me a good place to start.

Just for comparison, what would an AMD build look like?

How does the 4070 SUPER compare to the 3090?

I noticed this spec uses DDR4 memory, how much performance increase would a DDR5 spec have, and would it push the budget way over?
 
Last edited:
Great, sounds like a good idea.

If you want to make use of mezzanine workflows (proxy workflows) then that 1tb won’t go far, but is a good start. I’m a big fan of Windows Storage Spaces for working drives, which you could use to add another drive to the 1tb in the future.

Looks like I need to research a few more things :D
 
How does the 4070 SUPER compare to the 3090?
For gaming performance, they're fairly similar (albeit the 4070 Super is more efficient), though double the VRAM is no joke.

I noticed this spec uses DDR4 memory, how much performance increase would a DDR5 spec have, and would it push the budget way over?
This might be of interest, though note they're using a 4090 and testing at 1080p, the gap will be smaller with a lesser card and a higher resolution:

Edit: new video released today, this is with a lesser card and CPU:

Just for comparison, what would an AMD build look like?
If you're happy importing or waiting for a good deal, I'm sure you could pick up a 7700 for this price.

AMD equivalent GPU is a 7900 GRE, which I don't think is an issue for Resolve, but it might be for Premiere Pro?

My basket at OcUK:

Total: £1,202.42 (includes delivery: £0.00)​
 
Last edited:
I would strongly recommend sticking with an Intel. Simple answer is that you're probably going to want to have Intel Quicksync - you may see almost double the performance over a similar AMD setup.

Less simple answer... Back to those proxy workflows I mentioned. Basically, the codecs that cameras shoot to (like your phone shooting h.264/h.265(HEVC)) are generally highly compressed, which means that whilst the files are nice and small, your computer has to work hard to decompress them on the fly, constantly, as you work in your NLE. Which is hard work for it.

So to counter this, and make it easier for the system, we create a new copy of the media before editing - transcoding / converting all footage to a mezzanine codec, such as ProRes, Cineform, or DNxHR. These are very minimally compressed formats, which make it very easy for the processor to handle. They may also be relatively low quality - a low bitrate HD copy. This is called 'offline' media (which is why I'm known as an 'Offline Editor', as I work with the 'offline' copy of the footage).

The 1st downside of offline footage is that, being minimally compressed, it's now huge. As a result you need lots of storage, and that storage needs to be fast. The 2nd downside is that you have to make the offline footage in the first place, which means quite a lot of transcoding and organising before you can even begin editing.

Once you've finished your edit, you then re-link to the original camera files (the 'online' copy) and do your final export (this is part of the 'Online Editor's' job). This way you get a smoother edit by using lower quality footage, but end up with the best possible quality final export.

Hope you're still with me!!

So, if you don't fancy doing all that just yet, and you want to work with h.264/h.265(HEVC)/AV1 footage directly on your timeline, then your CPU will need all the help it can get. Intel have their Quicksync technology, which decodes those codecs on the fly, massively helping out your system, and giving a huge boost over any AMD system.

An Nvidia GPU has something very similar also, but not quite so good.
 
Last edited:
That's great, thanks for the detailed replay @AyeAyeAhoy! I followed most of it :)

Think I'll certainly stick with Nvidia and Intel, I've always had Nvidia GPU, but this will be my first Intel build.

I'm going to spend some time looking at parts and specs to see what I can cram into budget going off of @Tetras spec.

I'll post here again when I'm ready to go to triple check it's all compatible.
Big thanks to all who took the time to post with advice, it's much appreciated.

Also, if anyone can shed any light on my current ram issue, feel free :)

https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/threads/boot-issue-faulty-memory.18994511/#post-37447578
 
Back
Top Bottom