• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Bye Bye AMD

SOLDNER-MOFO64 said:
I know that's what he meant, I just wanted him to word it correctly.

INTEL (as we all know) are also far easier to OC due to FSB/MEM DIVIDER only. As I understand it nOObs practice on INTELS first to get the basics down then they switch to AMD for a proper challenge ;) :p
oh no you could be a noob (or not sad enough to give a 4x)
 
stickroad said:
Not really mate. Where do you get all this from?

oh for crying out loud you little baby......it was SARCASM.

You see the smiley face and tongue out??????? get a grip mate.....please.

tomos said:
my first AMD overclock was my X2 and that was easy. maybe i was lucky but i found no difference in overclocking either AMD or Intel (apart from intel overclocking further of course)

exactly...thanQ

Slam62 said:
oh no you could be a noob (or not sad enough to give a 4x)

Have you been to the same "MAKE SENSE" classes as stickroad? :D ;) :p
 
SOLDNER-MOFO64 said:
I know that's what he meant, I just wanted him to word it correctly.

INTEL (as we all know) are also far easier to OC due to FSB/MEM DIVIDER only. As I understand it nOObs practice on INTELS first to get the basics down then they switch to AMD for a proper challenge ;) :p


Ummn, I hope your joking.


I started on NForce 2, then went onto Nforce 4 and now im on 965.

All exactly the same to overclock.
 
SOLDNER-MOFO64 said:
Have you been to the same "MAKE SENSE" classes as stickroad? :D ;) :p

I bet anyone else reading your little posts most people would say the same about yours.

I did not say AMD were harder to overclock than Intel, i meant in the sense that the Core 2 Duos clock much higher which they do.
 
Last edited:
Concorde Rules said:
Ummn, I hope your joking.


I started on NForce 2, then went onto Nforce 4 and now im on 965.

All exactly the same to overclock.

Sarcasm from Greek σαρκασμός (sarkasmos), 'mockery, sarcasm' is sneering, jesting, or mocking at a person, situation or thing. It is strongly associated with irony, with some definitions classifying it as a type of verbal irony intended to insult or wound[1] — stating the opposite of the intended meaning, e.g. using "that's fantastic" to mean "that's awful". It is used mostly in a humorous manner, and is expressed through vocal intonations such as over-emphasizing the actual statement or particular words.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm
 
Last edited:
stickroad said:
I bet anyone else reading your little posts most people would say the same about yours.

I did not say AMD were harder to overclock than Intel, i meant in the sense that the Core 2 Duos clock much higher which they do.

much higher huh? Are we talking in pure Mhz here or actual percentage?

What percentage over stock speed do you run your C2D?

They CAN overclock considerably higher in the correct circumstances....sometimes there can be very little in it between each...depending on what can be obtained by any individual.
 
SOLDNER-MOFO64 said:
much higher huh? Are we talking in pure Mhz here or actual percentage?

Both.

They CAN overclock considerably higher in the correct circumstances....sometimes there can be very little in it between each...depending on what can be obtained by any individual.

95% of the core 2 duo's do 3ghz at least, that's a fact, wich makes em faster as a 4ghz amd x2, amd has nothing to throw against an overclocked c2d, since x2's top out @ 3.2-3.5 ghz...
 
snowdog said:
95% of the core 2 duo's do 3ghz at least, that's a fact, wich makes em faster as a 4ghz amd x2, amd has nothing to throw against an overclocked c2d, since x2's top out @ 3.2-3.5 ghz...

Yo PENT boy....go calculate your percentage gain on clockspeed and come back. Until then you're boring me.
 
SOLDNER-MOFO64 said:
Yo PENT boy....go calculate your percentage gain on clockspeed and come back. Until then you're boring me.

SOLDNER-MOFO64 stop trying to be a smart ass. If someone asked for you to spec them a machine, they will be overclocking the system, which CPU would you recommend them?

No one in their right mind would choose AMD over Intel if your going to be overclocking at the moment, maybe you but you know you seem to be on a totally different planet to the rest of us.
 
Last edited:
SOLDNER-MOFO64 said:
Yo PENT boy....go calculate your percentage gain on clockspeed and come back. Until then you're boring me.


61% at least on a e6300/6400, upto 90% if on a good board. And yes stop being a smartass, show me 1 AMD cpu that once overclocked, can compare anywhere near to a e6300 @ 3ghz.
 
stickroad said:
SOLDNER-MOFO64 stop trying to be a smart ass. If someone asked for you to spec them a machine, they will be overclocking the system, which CPU would you recommend them?

AM2 for Barcelona quad-core compatability.

No one in their right mind would choose AMD over Intel if your going to be overclocking at the moment, maybe you but you know you seem to be on a totally different planet to the rest of us.

A. When did I say an AMD was more powerfull? learn to read ;)

B. I can get a 90% FSB OC and a 55% clockspeed OC with a £50 X2-3600.

C. My cpu scales almost as well as your's except my tech is 3yrs old...yours is 1yr old.

D. Stop trying to make this into a "MOFO SAID A64 ARE FASTER THAN C2D" rant, 'cos that ain't what I said. Now stop jumping to the offensive simply because I didn't say "Woootzorz....AMD sux INTELS ba**s".

It's true what they say, the mentality of 90% of C2D owners is the same......hence they all decend upon any comment made with C2D and INTEL in it to bleat out their "OOOOhhhh C2D crushes A64" rants.
 
Last edited:
SOLDNER-MOFO64 said:
B. I can get a 90% FSB OC and a 55% clockspeed OC with a £50 X2-3600.



As said b4, pretty much all 6300 do more as 60% extra on clockspeed.
Wich is more as 55% on ** 3600+.


Also for your info, im not a c2d owner :o , I own an am2 x2 3600+ and a pentium D 3.0 ghz as my own pc's.
 
SOLDNER-MOFO64 said:
A. When did I say an AMD was more powerfull? learn to read

When did i say that you said AMD was more powerfull?

And i don't think AMD suck at all, i haven't said that once in this entire thread, i even said if i was not going to do any overclocking i would go for AMD.

So your the one who needs to learn to read:
SOLDNER-MOFO64 said:
 
Last edited:
SOLDNER-MOFO64 said:
You started it, so you can finish it. I'll stop when you stop.

How old are you 12?

Stickroad said:
When did i say that you said AMD was more powerfull?

Answer my question?

SOLDNER-MOFO64 said:
editing your posts later......that your style huh? lamer

Your obviously getting stressed out here since your starting to use inappropriate language.
 
Last edited:
stickroad said:
Answer my question?

Your obviously getting stressed out here since your starting to use inappropriate language.

You called me a smarta$$ you little liar, so don't hide behind edited post and scream MUMMY HE'S SWEARING. There's lame then there's LAAAME and your bordering on the latter.

Your tone and manner say you think INTEL is better in everyway. Since you're sure you don't think that though, explain which aspect(s) of AMD you THINK are better than C2D?

Here's a compare I pulled from the '06 thread. Notice how this users C2D is at 3800mhz (my 3600 is at 2805mhz)....and his 8800GTS is maxed out...mine is a little off, yet he still barely beats my SM2.0 &3.0 scores even though his CPU scores 50% more???????

C2D-X2compare.jpg


Seems to me that C2D NEEDS to be at 3800mhz to pull that score from the card. Would anyone like to run they're C2D at 2805Mhz with an 8800GTS maxed out and see how we compare.

Put your 1yr old CUTTING EDGE POWERPLANT up againts my 3yr old ageing A64 at the same clocks and we'll see what's what yeah? Got the bottle?

Now, going by your theory....the C2D should be way out infront yeah?

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1250260 C2D @ 3800mhz

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1250260 X2-3600 @ 2805mhz
 
Last edited:
SOLDNER-MOFO64 said:
Your tone and manner say you think INTEL is better in everyway. Since you're sure you don't think that though, explain which aspect(s) of AMD you THINK are better than C2D?

Anyone else think that, be interesting to know?
 
Last edited:
stickroad said:
Anyone else think that be interesting to know?

It doesn't matter what anyone else thinks...me and you are arguing......you can end it all by explaining the MORE ADVANTAGIOUS points to an AMD cpu since you're not 100% INTEL.....that's what you said right? You don't think INTEL are better in everyway?
 
SOLDNER-MOFO64 said:
It doesn't matter what anyone else thinks...me and you are arguing......you can end it all by explaining the MORE ADVANTAGIOUS points to an AMD cpu since you're not 100% INTEL.....that's what you said right? You don't think INTEL are better in everyway?

I have NEVER EVER said Intel was better than AMD, AMD is better than INTEL.

AMD are on equal paths with Intel if you compare one chip to another at stock speeds.

When you start overclocking Intel take off. When ever you see a spec me thread and they say they will be overclocking, time after time people always spec a Intel system.
 
Last edited:
stickroad said:
I have NEVER EVER said Intel was better than AMD, AMD is better than INTEL.

AMD are on equal paths with Intel if you compare one chip to another at stock speeds.

When you start overclocking Intel take off. Ok then when ever people ask for someone to spec a system for them why is it always Intel?

Because people look at Super Pi and they're eyes fall out. Most don't even realise it's a single threaded app (nice try intel) and since C2D BRAND NEW architecture treat all APPS as MULTI-THREADED (as in they use both cores for all apps) then it's really a no-brainer that INTEL look good in that bench. Create a MULTI-THREADED Super Pi and things would be a lot closer, with the AMD winning out at the same clocks in some benches.

Take 3D mark for example.......the majority of us play games right....well lets see a 2805mhz C2D & 8800GTS setup.....let's see how it CRUSHES my AMD.

No takers???? Jeeez it's gone awful quiet in here.... :D
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom