Canadian Grand Prix 2011, Circuit Gilles Villeneuve - Race 7/19

We had an equal number of successful and unsuccessful challenges into that chicane using the DRS.. it seemed pretty well planned to me.

:confused: where you watching a different race,other than webber outbreaking himself twice. It was a clear pass before the corner.
 
or they should scrap DRS and let them build more powerful kers units

And continue to restrict dirty air,I still cant fathom the lack of press on how effective banning Double Diffuser is and that, the rules are so tight they arent going to replace. It has halved the following distance down from 1sec+ last year to 0.4-0.6secs this year.
That by far has had the biggest good impact this season.


DRS is necessary to keep public interest in the sport, without overtaking and excitement the sport dies.

.
It was a knee jerk reaction to the teams using Double Diffusers which they've banned anyway. It's just not needed, they can now follow closely as we have seen at every single race this season.
 
So the implementation can be improved at this track? First time it has been used there so you'll afford the implementation some leeway this year?

Vettel kept Hamilton behind him in Spain despite DRS.

No becuase it is an unfair and pointless system. Some tracks it hasn't worked.
 
Yes and we could show film from the Turbo Era or ground effect cars as well which was even better, however, nowadays, with the current rules, no refueling (lighter cars) we have DRS instead.

You can't compare DRS to turbos or anything else ever implemented in F1
 
I can compare it for the improvment in entertainment it gives.

Fixed, it does nothing to help racing at all, in fact it is a massive down side to racing and detracts from the sport.
If you are looking for entertainment rather than racing then yes it's animorovment. But that's not what any sport should be about.
 
Which is understandable, considering it isn't an exact science and every track is different with its own implementation.

The fairness is debatable. Does DRS just negate dirty air? Does it give more of an advantage? Is it all about implementation? Hard to say, as you allude to, it has worked at some tracks.

I did think it was odd to have 2 zones though. Bit of testing I think there.

It does nothing to negate dirty air, it does nothing to keep the cars closer over the lap, all it does is give an unfair advantage to the car behind.
As I said two zones made next to no difference today. Almost all clean drove round the other in the first zone. About the only one was massa at the finish. Is that racing? Having an unfair speed advantage, no skill and no way to defend.
 
Looking at that old Stewart/Tyrell video, look at how basic the wings are. The front wing is pretty much single piece plus two flaps, and the rear wing is single flat pieces. No stupid winglets and stuff.

which is what they should have done in 2013, ground effect & banning of winglets.
 
Some tracks, maybe, unfair? Gonna have to disagree, every car has it, it improves racing, and is a far more fair system than used in touring cars where weight penalties are added for psotive results.

Every car might use it, but they can't use it, thus it's unfair,
It does. Not improve racing, it improves entertainment. There is nothing good about the overtakes. This Isn't touring cars, this is the supposedly the pinnacle of racing. Although I would say the lemans today showed f1 how to do it.
 
I hope DRS is here to stay. I'd rather watch a sport with DRS and overtaking than no DRS and no excitement at all.

Or no DRS and over taking, it is almost cure by banning of double diffuser anyway. If they went ahead with ground effect and removed winglets they would have literally been able to travel touching each other.
 
But that just doesn't make sense. How can it give an unfair advantage without at least negating the dirty air?
.

Because it doesn't negate dirty air, it does nothing to solve the problem and as soon as it shuts they immediately fall back in the dirty air. Solve the problem, don't introduce an unfair device.

Some do hate DRS, some don't, at the end of the day 22 of them are on a very short PR leash. As well as most of them being a little out of f1 standards, just look at the calls saying it's indri able. Then look at Lewis, MSC, senna, mansel and other f1 drivers of the past who leaped half the field in a couple of laps.
 
This makes F1 a better sport for spectators, and if you think F1 is about "Fair" then you should be campaigning for identical cars and tyres at all times.
.

Stupid comment, they all build to same rules, f1 is 70% car weighted and as it should be.

F1 is racing and you can get the spectacle without removing the racing. In fact fia already have solved the problem by 50% in one simple rule change.
 
I completely agree that there are better methods. But this is what we've got this year and it is doing exactly what it was designed to do. The fairness of the device could be argued either way. It is on every car, if you are fast enough to get in the zone and use it then you have a better chance to pass. If you get passed then do the same back on the next lap... if you are fast enough to keep up.

It can't be argued either way. It doesn't matter if it's on all cars. Only one car can use it, the one behind.
 
Last edited:
No, it gives an advantage in one (or two) area of the circuit to make up for the fact they have had dirty air for the rest of the circuit, mainly in the corners where aerodynamics massively benefit a car in front and penalise a following car.

It rewards a driver who has managed to catch and stay close to a very evenly matched car in an overtaking area, the payback being if he gets past, next lap, the car passed will have DRS to mount a challenge back.

Therefore it is completely fair if the passed driver has the skill to stay with the driver who passes him.

So you what time trailing, that is not racing. Dirty air is more or less solved this year anyway and can be further improved.
 
It's solved by double diffuser ban, the following gap is now down to 0.5seconds. It is not a huge disadvantage at all, more than close enough for a slipstream.
 
That solves the disrupted airflow over a front wing during a fast corner does it?

Clueless springs to mind, half a second is 45 metres at 200mph how is that close enough for a slipstream?

:rolleyes: at 200 coming out of a corner, that's some exit speed.
There has always been dirty air. Every time you punch something through air, you create dirty air. It's nothing new in f1 it's just since the mid 90s it's been getting worse and worse, till the last couple of years, where they have reduced it and with double diffuser ban, they halved it in one swoop.
 
Back
Top Bottom