• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Capping FPS

I doubt I could tell the difference between 120-144 but the system did once drop to 85Hz and I easily noticed something was off when running around in game compared to the 120 I normally use.
 
Can you really not tell the difference between 60 and 120? It's a night and day difference to almost everyone, outside of those who use a controller for everything.
I know there's a difference, but playing, casually, I can't really tell, unless I'm paying attention to it. But maybe as I didn't mention, I don't really play fast-paced/competitive games, just the odd open world/single player, as long never drops from 60, and all at ultra or high, not an issue for me.
 
I agree, lol. There is a huge difference between even 90 and 60. The difference gets less noticeable the higher you go but I think most people would top out at about 120. Play for a while at 90 then going back to 60 is really noticeable.
When playing RE2, I could tell if dropped from 60 (Vega 56 at the time). I think I started capping at 60 after playing Skyrim for months, as anything over 60 would be an issue (engine issue, I guess)
 
Anyone see any differences or issues in capping FPS in either, RiverTuner, Nividia control panel or AMD Radeon software?

I don't know about AMD Radeon software but NVIDIA certainly works and so does RiverTuner. I now use NVIDIA software since I don't need to run RiverTuner ( RiverTuner is not required for MSI Afterburner, it just adds a few features that I don't want.). NVIDIA seems to be a little more accurate than RivaTuner. I guess that's to be expected though.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom