Her eligibility to compete in women's athletics is up to the IAAF and probably the courts to determine, not us !
kind of irrelevant, I think everyone posting is well aware that their opinion/post on the matter isn't going to affect her eligibility
Her eligibility to compete in women's athletics is up to the IAAF and probably the courts to determine, not us !
Caster Semenya has lost a landmark case against athletics' governing body meaning it will be allowed to restrict testosterone levels in female runners.
The Court of Arbitration for Sport (Cas) rejected the South African's challenge against the IAAF's new rules.
But Cas said it had "serious concerns as to the future practical application" of the regulations.
Olympic 800m champion Semenya, 28, said in response to the ruling that the IAAF "have always targeted me specifically".
Now she - and other athletes with differences of sexual development (DSD) - must either take medication in order to compete in track events from 400m to the mile, or change to another distance.
"For a decade the IAAF has tried to slow me down, but this has actually made me stronger. The decision of Cas will not hold me back," said Semenya in a statement.
"I will once again rise above and continue to inspire young women and athletes in South Africa and around the world."
Previously, she had said that she wanted to "run naturally, the way I was born".
Cas found that the rules for athletes with DSD were discriminatory - but that the discrimination was "necessary, reasonable and proportionate" to protect "the integrity of female athletics".
Why should she be discriminated against because of her biological makeup?
I thought we were now living in this weird world where everything has to be equal?
No, my fault. I was mistaken in thinking she was a woman. That said, my views are at the minute pre 2018 so many probably won't agree with me.
I do think men should compete with men (I mean men, you know...men) and women with women. Some disagree, which was my original point I guess. Strange times ahead.
Of course I see the point that putting women with somebody who has male levels of testosterone makes the whole competition pointless as obviously the higher testosterone gives absolute advantage but then again, it was her genetic make up since birth. Should we punish Michael Phelps for his freak genetic make up that make him perfect for swimming?
Complicated situation. Personally I think it is unfair for trans M to F compete with women, it just seems not fair but here we have Semenya who is not altering her body, she was born this way. I have conflicting view on the whole thing as I personally think her winning is unfair but at the same time why is it unfair, she was born this way and she is a female.
Caster is not a man identifying as a woman. She is a woman with atypically high testosterone.
There is not a single shred of evidence for this ridiculous assertion. None. Nada. Zip. It's slander made up by prize turds. If it WAS the case the IAAF wouldn't haven't repeatedly found that she is female, and the whole mess wouldn't have come to testosterone test levels.
The tests carried out on the 18 year-old shortly after her victory in Berlin are believed to have shown that she has a chromosomal abnormality that gives her both male and female characteristics.
According to reports in the Australian media, the medical tests have established that she has no womb or ovaries and that she also has internal testes – the male sexual organs responsible for producing testosterone.
Earlier analysis had revealed that Semenya's testosterone levels were three times the normal level for a woman.
The International Association of Athletics Federations received the results of Semenya's 'gender verification test' this week, but it has refused to confirm the findings until they have been verified by a panel of independent scientific experts and the athlete has been personally informed.
But Pierre Weiss, the IAAF secretary general, hinted strongly at the results on Thursday when he said: "It is clear that she is a woman, but maybe not 100 per cent. We have to see if she has an advantage from her possibly being between two sexes compared to the others."
They passed her to compete as female. A pair of hanging balls, as asserted, would have been pretty clear evidence against, no?
There is no publicly available evidence as to the nature of her condition.
In a sense any form of increased testosterone could be considered intersex but there are plenty of causes that aren't usually considered so. Either way she is not a man trying to pass as a woman. She IS a woman. The questions about how she should compete is complex enough without bringing this rubbish into it; and is a quite different question as to whether transgender women should be able to compete.
I'd don't believe you're so stupid as to think that the normal use of "balls" doesn't refer to an external part of the male genitalia. When that's not what you mean try using the words that do mean what you mean.
There is not a single shred of evidence for this ridiculous assertion. None. Nada. Zip. It's slander made up by prize turds. If it WAS the case the IAAF wouldn't haven't repeatedly found that she is female, and the whole mess wouldn't have come to testosterone test levels.
If you can't even be bothered to read to even Wikipedia level, I can't help you.
Multiple allegations have been levelled at Caster including that she has both male and female sexual attributes. I can't know that people are suddenly using words in a new way.
Are you seriously saying you don't know the IAAF repeatedly passed her as female? Try reading Wikipedia to get some basic facts.
There is not a single shred of evidence for this ridiculous assertion. None. Nada. Zip. It's slander made up by prize turds. If it WAS the case the IAAF wouldn't haven't repeatedly found that she is female, and the whole mess wouldn't have come to testosterone test levels.
They passed her to compete as female. That's all. This is not really relevant if we're not taking about balls anymore.
Maybe women don't mind competing with a part man... Any professional women athletes here or anyone know one to ask?
We can complain all we want but it should really be a discussion for the people involved.
Sharp told the BBC after the race: “I have tried to avoid the issue all year. You can see how emotional it all was. We know how each other feels. It is out of our control and how much we rely on people at the top sorting it out. The public can see how difficult it is with the change of rule but all we can do is give it our best.
Are we really talking trans in a thread about an intersex person?
Apologies i havent read all 14 pages of this thread but does this person have a vagina or not? Does this person have functioning breasts? Is this person capable of giving birth?
She won the 800M in Doha by a length today.
Sharp, 28, told BBC Sport she had received death threats as a result of previous comments she had made about Semenya's "advantage".
"I've known Caster since 2008, it's something I've been familiar with over the past 11 years," she said
"No-one benefits from this situation - of course she doesn't benefit, but it's not me versus her, it's not us versus them.
"I've had death threats. I've had threats against my family and that's not a position I want to be in, it's really unfortunate the way it's played out.
"By no means am I over the moon about this, it's just been a long 11 years for everyone."
Likewise, i haven't read the entire thread but is there anything medically that makes them female if they don't have female reproductive organs?
I find this article quite interesting; have the Fatima Whitbreads of the past dodged a bullet?
https://www.theguardian.com/comment...athletics-south-african-ethics-sport-science?