PMKeates said:What different people have achieved at different times in cars of different tune on different roads are not really comparable.
I'll say categorically that an ST170 will be faster than a VTS above 100 MPH. At that speed, power is becoming virtually all that matters, and the ST has 40% more.
Does it matter, though?digitalwolf said:Are ST's modable? Many of us are aware of what a VTS can be taken up too.
What about a focus?
PMKeates said:Does it matter, though?
I could supercharge my car to 330hp, but it doesn't make it faster than a 335i now!
So what is it you're actually trying to say?digitalwolf said:A supercharged VTS would quite easily outrun a ST170........the video of one beating an M3 has been doing the rounds for ages.
s0ck said:They're fine but some say they're a bit ugly/getting on now. Bosch pumps are mainly on the earlier models. They run higher fuel pressure (180bar~) and are much more suited to veg oil than the Lucas. They generally see more power from tuning/better economy etc, presumably because of the higher pressure.
[TW]Fox said:Remember Phase 2 306 DT's on an R or S plate with DHY engines have a habit of throwing conrods through the side of the block. A blot on the XUTD's otherwise perfect reliability copybook.
[TW]Fox said:Remember Phase 2 306 DT's on an R or S plate with DHY engines have a habit of throwing conrods through the side of the block. A blot on the XUTD's otherwise perfect reliability copybook.
s0ck said:...which has been largely attributed to poor servicing/maintenance, not an inherent fault with the lump.
Oil and filter every 6k, job done.
digitalwolf said:I reckon in the twisties the VTS would leave the ST.
