Chelsea FC "Jealousy" ?

Chelsea Transfer Policy

image001.jpg
 
whos this backbone of english players chelsea have?

other then lampard and terry any other english players you have bought u've basically killed them lol.

scott parker awesome for charlton, goes to chelsea, you basically bought him so no one else coudl have him and then killed his career, till the good old boys at newcastle buy him and now look at him again bloody awesome again.

there doing it with SWP as well, brilliant for man city, chelsea buy him and it happens again, he had a sweet game the one before last so how do they reward him for it? by not playing him again.
 
EasyG said:
whos this backbone of english players chelsea have?

other then lampard and terry any other english players you have bought u've basically killed them lol.

scott parker awesome for charlton, goes to chelsea, you basically bought him so no one else coudl have him and then killed his career, till the good old boys at newcastle buy him and now look at him again bloody awesome again.

there doing it with SWP as well, brilliant for man city, chelsea buy him and it happens again, he had a sweet game the one before last so how do they reward him for it? by not playing him again.

how about joe cole? wasted talent at west ham, same at chelsea at the start but then changed suddenly...what a failure he is NOT!!!!!!!
 
EasyG said:
failure he is not , regular starting 11 he is not.
well ok but he has started at least half the prem games this season. and you can't deny that his all round game hasn't improved at chelsea. I am sure if he was still at west ham he'd be getting games but still wouldnt be as improved as he has become at chelsea.
 
I'm not jealous of Chelsea. They haven't done anything incredible. You could do what they've done with Acrington Stanley if you threw enough money at them.

Jealous of their money on the other hand..
 
LionOfJudah said:
well ok but he has started at least half the prem games this season. and you can't deny that his all round game hasn't improved at chelsea. I am sure if he was still at west ham he'd be getting games but still wouldnt be as improved as he has become at chelsea.
EasyG wasn't saying he was a bad player but was responding to someone saying Chelsea have a backbone of english players. EasyG was just pointing out that apart from Terry and Lampard the rest of regular players (chelsea's backbone) are foreign; Gallas, Del Horno, Carvalho, Makelele and Essien.
 
Agree with Andi , Chelsea have no prestige or history , all they did was buy the Premiership . Thats why Mourinho won't ever get the respect he wants at Chelsea . He did a fantastic job at Porto and much respect for that .

The jealousy comes in the fact , that they can buy their way out of problems ;)
 
You hit the nail on the head there duc999.

Who knows, if the future chelsea might have the prestige and the history but its going to take a lot of time to get there though.

Since Roman took over chelsea, they have bought anyone who Jose liked the look of etc and there is no going away from that fact. Yes, they have basically a 2nd team which most of those players will be first team starters for any other premiership side but money doesnt always bring you success at the end of the day.

With practically a whole new squad being bought, the manager had a tough task of gel'in the players together and getting a good team morale and a good organisation between the players on and off the pitch.

Im not jealous of Chelsea having all the money you need, it would be good if Man Utd had a 'spare' £40m lying around to buy Kaka but we aint and we have to get on with it. I dont really care that Chelsea has all this money.

Money doesnt buy you wins really. Just take last saturday for example. Chelsea get beat 3-0. Anything can happen in football on the day, its down to how the players perform as a team and individually and how much luck you got. Chelsea seem to have loads of it right now :p

At the end of the day, I want all the worlds best players in the premiership, being the best league to play in, but right now they are practically on the same team :D
 
Frosti said:
I’m seriously tired of people attributing Chelsea’s success to money alone. The players work extremely hard for each other on the pitch and show real desire to win things.

Real Madrid have shown that Money alone won’t bring Trophies and I didn’t see anyone complaining when Man Utd Spent £30Mil on Rooney, Van Nistlerooy, Veron, Ferdinand ect.

If Chelsea winning the title is a forgone conclusion these days, who’s fault is that? Arsenal, Liverpool, and Man Utd only have to play Chelsea twice each year, So I suppose it’s Chelsea’s fault too if they drop points against lower opposition too?

Sorry but it just sounds like sour grapes to me.

I agree with what you say. I hate people who say "Chelsea bought the premiership". Our players work like hell to be as good as they are. I bet if whoever the person who posted this, if there team was managed by a billionare they wouldnt be moaning about this would you?

Just leave it out, we have money, big woop, but we also have talent and we dont accuse other clubs of bull**** which some teams have be known for.

I will shut up there.

Dave
 
Yea, we shouldnt get away from the fact that the players have to put in thier bit. They need to make it all come together. They are doing a great job right now. Just want them to slip up so Utd can pounce. Maybe next season lol :D
 
Yup, you did. Anything can happen in football. You never know what can happen in the future.

*prays to god*

Please let chelsea have some badluck so Man Utd can catch them. Give them a battle.

Fingers crossed :D
 
I agree with a lot of points in here.
Apart from a consistant one that seems prevailent in a lot of fans.
There are only 3 true heavy weights in European football, and they are Real, Milan & Liverpool, based on what they have won European wise.

Juve, Inter, ManU, Arsenal, Barca, Chelsea, Munich & whatever are big teams. But what have they won European wise? Not a lot.

And yes Chelsea have been buying the Premiership. The other teams earned the money to buy players. Chelsea had the money plonked in front of them and were told to buy a league winning squad.
 
BoomAM said:
Juve, Inter, ManU, Arsenal, Barca, Chelsea, Munich & whatever are big teams. But what have they won European wise? Not a lot.
I think Bayern Munich should be grouped with Real, Milan and Liverpool. They have won the European Cup 4 times and you have to remember that German clubs HAVE to make a profit every year. So for them to compete with other top clubs that, with the exception of Liverpool (with the exception of year before last) and Man Utd, can lose money every year and still buy top players is very impressive.
 
BaZ87 said:
I think Bayern Munich should be grouped with Real, Milan and Liverpool. They have won the European Cup 4 times and you have to remember that German clubs HAVE to make a profit every year. So for them to compete with other top clubs that, with the exception of Liverpool (with the exception of year before last) and Man Utd, can lose money every year and still buy top players is very impressive.
What have they won though?
They never seem to get that far in Europe lately.
Bayern are an outside shot, but regardless, the other teams dont deserve to be named in the same sentance as the other 3 (4?) in regards to European heavy weights.
 
BoomAM said:
What have they won though?
They never seem to get that far in Europe lately.
Bayern are an outside shot, but regardless, the other teams dont deserve to be named in the same sentance as the other 3 (4?) in regards to European heavy weights.
Like i said they have won the European Cup 4 times!!!! As for recently Real and Liverpool (apart from last year) haven't been amazingly successful. I agree that Man Utd etc shouldn't be called a great European side.
 
Back
Top Bottom