Christian State (CS) Discussion Thread

Where are the Christians coming out and having a go at this group, like many people expect every Muslim to come out against terrorists every time there is an atrocity?

tbh i imagine most haven't heard about a couple of badly written letters.
 
I'm afraid I'm struggling here. You've said that islam is decentralised, but are still expecting world leaders of islam to speak out?
I suggested it reform like Christianity, appoint some kind of overall authority, agree to cut out the pointless, violent, anti Semitic crap in the Qu'ran and move on.
Or just carry on killing each other during the cycles of tribal power.

Really it can do what it likes, but as far as the world is concerned
Islam = Terrorism
If they feel like changing that then they will have to do better than repeating "yes but, the Crusaders killed people too..."

Has the pope spoken out against followers of christianity?
I remember some speeches about Christians not being Christian enough, that kind of thing. It would take me a while to dig out actual quotes.

What, exactly, are you intending to point out when referring to Africa and the ME? Are you telling me that because you don't feel certain geographical areas of the world haven't been contributing to the advancement on the world that you'd like to limit the gene pool and work against evolution? Or are you saying that genetic diversity is a bad thing?
I was suggesting that if religious and quasi religious groups culled each other, it would be no great loss to mankind.
I was thinking more about the obvious negative impact of cultural diversity rather than genetic diversity. Although I don't see how the centuries of inbreeding in the ME and African countries is going to help Western advancement.


-
 
Last edited:
He's a police officer afaik so I assume they get reports on crimes on the rise before we do.

I presume its just as much the anti Semites as the white power guys.

The problem with Police "information" is that they will keep quiet about any offences involving muslims, and just report offences against muslims as hate crimes.
The media (especially the BBC :rolleyes:) is complicit in this.

They've spoken openly about not wishing to incite hatred, stereotype one community or give any political advantage to the far right groups, and by pitching this as the Police protecting one group against hate crimes, they can demand budget increases.

I've no reason to believe muslims are committing any more offences than any other group, probably less if anything, but we are being deliberately misled as to what is happening.


As for Burnsey's point, I might be able to find out if it is true or not.

I'm pretty sure any far right group foolish enough to commit organised hate crimes, would become ultra top priority and crushed faster and harder than a nut in a black hole.

The State is fine with terrorism, but anarchy bites at the establishment - remember the harsh judicial punishments handed out for stealing a bag of rice during the last black riots?
Examples were being made out of mere kids.


-
 
Last edited:
I've no reason to believe muslims are committing any more offences than any other group, probably less if anything, but we are being deliberately misled as to what is happening.



-

depends what you mean "Muslims" or say the Pakistani/typically Muslim associated Asian ethnicities.

as i dont think we record perp by religion but by ethnicity Asians/Pakistanis have a significantly higher crime rate per person than white British people.

interesting little stat though

The British Crime Survey reveals that in 2004, 87,000 people from black or minority ethnic communities said they had been a victim of a racially motivated crime. They had suffered 49,000 violent attacks, with 4,000 being wounded.

At the same time 92,000 white people said they had also fallen victim of a racially motivated crime. The number of violent attacks against whites reached 77,000, while the number of white people who reported being wounded was five times the number of black and minority ethnic victims at 20,000
 
The State is fine with terrorism, but anarchy bites at the establishment - remember the harsh judicial punishments handed out for stealing a bag of rice during the last black riots?
Examples were being made out of mere kids.


-

iirc if something is declared a riot the punishments go up dramatically for anyone involved
 
remember the harsh judicial punishments handed out for stealing a bag of rice during the last black riots?

Are they commonly known as this? :eek: I'm pretty sure the idiots were from all local backgrounds.

depends what you mean "Muslims" or say the Pakistani/typically Muslim associated Asian ethnicities.

as i dont think we record perp by religion but by ethnicity Asians/Pakistanis have a significantly higher crime rate per person than white British people.

interesting little stat though

The British Crime Survey reveals that in 2004, 87,000 people from black or minority ethnic communities said they had been a victim of a racially motivated crime. They had suffered 49,000 violent attacks, with 4,000 being wounded.

At the same time 92,000 white people said they had also fallen victim of a racially motivated crime. The number of violent attacks against whites reached 77,000, while the number of white people who reported being wounded was five times the number of black and minority ethnic victims at 20,000

Hard for these figures to be taken with a complete meaning when the different cultures have different attitudes to reporting crimes.

With the grouping of ethnicities there is no parallel to draw.
 
2011 England riots; but don't let the facts get in the way of a good tagline.

Well I wasn't intending to make anything of that, I just didn't know if it had a name. But now you've made me look it up, yes there were a disproportionate number of ethnics who were prosecuted. But then it did all kick off after a black kid was shot, so I'd suggest that the ownership of the unrest lies with them.

My point was merely one of how the State would react to a race war, it will happily tolerate the slow breakdown of social cohesion, but it won't tolerate any reaction to that.
The assumption is that we will all become so numb to any discontent, so conditioned to liberal doublethink, that we will stop caring about our culture and just become consumers of whatever is left.
 
Where are the Christians coming out and having a go at this group, like many people expect every Muslim to come out against terrorists every time there is an atrocity?

when you have atheist terror groups running around - then I'll make a statement :D However I agree with your point!

Oh.. and this is way before it's time - including the gender reassignment..

 
This reads like satire, but beware. Even now there are probably a couple of imams planning a round of rabble-rousing over it.

However there's no indication who actually created it - those that wish to perpetuate the struggle by simulating oppressors, those that feel left out in extremism but like a beer.. the list is too long.

Also there was a comment about one member in another thread always referring to Israel and Palestine even if the OP didn't post about it.. now I can see it!
 
The assumption is that we will all become so numb to any discontent, so conditioned to liberal doublethink, that we will stop caring about our culture and just become consumers of whatever is left.

I think that all states need cohesion. In-fact having a state in outright civil war is not a state.

States are driven by politicians driven by voters regardless of religion, if a voter is religious and appeals to the religious vote - how can that voter operate with respect to other religious standings?

Religion has been carving up the world years before democratic rule, as a source of control and power when people didn't have free will.
 
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/622834/Christian-State-Islamic-State-Muslims-mosque

lAKWloV.jpg


Christian Terrorist groups have arisen from their slumber it seems. I wonder if they draw their inspiration from the knights of templar with their frightening and sadistic threats. Since we have a thread dedicated to ISIL let's have one for Christian State which is the new threat.

Just lol
 
This is basically just a laughable left wing propaganda article. It always makes me smile when the lefties stick up for Islam considering how utterly right wing Islam is
 
Back
Top Bottom