Associate
Americans (particularly right wing ones) are mostly hot hair and nothing more, they talk about civil war but it's all a faux macho front. No way all these blowhards sacrifice their quality of life for a war against the libs.
Americans (particularly right wing ones) are mostly hot hair and nothing more, they talk about civil war but it's all a faux macho front. No way all these blowhards sacrifice their quality of life for a war against the libs.
Anything by Garland I'll watch
Americans (particularly right wing ones) are mostly hot hair and nothing more, they talk about civil war but it's all a faux macho front. No way all these blowhards sacrifice their quality of life for a war against the libs.
Lul.....wut?I mean history says otherwise. It was the Democrats who refused to give up their salves. The republicans were the ones who wanted it abolished and despite many attempts to resolve it peacefully it was the Democrats who took it too far and ultimately got obliterated.
The same scenario now would again see the Democrats obliterated, they may have the seats of power, but all their supporters are all bark and no bite.
I very much doubt all the blue haired liberals would be picking up arms to defend their side. They'd be too busy screaming at the opposition for misgendering them!
It's average Joe in the rust belt with an arsenal of guns in his basement that would be the wake up call needed.
Lul.....wut?
They seem to have taken the fact that the Republican and Democrat parties have evolved and changed their positions over the last 160 odd years and really run with it. As far as I'm aware it is true to say that once upon a time the Southern Democrats supported slavery. But it's also true to say that since the 1960s the Democrats have clearly been more in favour of civil rights etc. than the Republicans.
If you look at the history, the republican party have always been a champion for civil rights, not the democrats.
Up until the 1960s the democrats were always trying to block , overturn or weaken civil rights, have they really changed much since then, or is it just a case of giveth with one hand, taketh away with the other, but my American history is a little rusty, as quite frankly dear I couldn't give a damn![]()
My impression from the trailer is that the action focus is deliberately misleading for the sake of increasing the audience: I presume that there will be very little action… the large scale conflict will largely be ‘inferred’ (no big battles) and it will follow a small group (or groups) with their specific low-key experiences.
it's A24 and Alex Garland, so it should be more than a brainless action film. It's whether they can pull multiple threads together to make a coherent and interesting plot. The film adaption of Garland's The Beach does show what happens when money gets in the way, and hopefully Garland learnt from that.