Good bit of context here. Feeling slightly better about it now.
That makes me feel worse, guys who got more involved in series 2 and were most senior in three, and taught everyone how to write the show as it was being written end of series 3 make an episode this bad. Being most experienced doesn't mean being best, and ultimately I think this is where a LOT of shows fall down. The best writers on a great new show get offers to get WAY more money on an established show that needs fresh blood, so the best writers leave, then you have the crap left over, thinking they are the best, pushing their idea's and the show becomes worse.
At least thats how it feels in this situation, the show has totally changed from series 1, the characters have all become almost only their "biggest" character trait as the show started. Ahbed is now nothing but mental, Pierce is a complete crack pot/racist/stupid/retarded when his character was far more interesting in series one, from the apologise to Shirley going to the wrong bench parts, to the teaching her to make a public speech. He was a good guy who did daft things because he's a bit insane, now he's insane, not likeable and generally not funny either.
What the new guys needed to do was come in, and re-establish the dynamic from the first season, but instead its just gone further the way its been going for the last couple seasons, which combined with them saying they are letting the couple writers who have been their the longest "teach" everyone how to do it, suggests to me its those couple writers that have been taking Community in the wrong direction and that interview only reinforces the idea that the show will move further in the direction its been going....
It was a poor episode, not a single part of Ahbed's dream world was funny, at all, the dean stuff is getting creepier and creepier while at the same time less and less funny, most of the "competition" wasn't funny.
What was funny was, I had this fear that we would get a bunch of new people who would want to do standard sitcom stuff. And the opposite turned out to be true. All the new people came in, and they could not wait to do Community-style stuff. It was me and Megan and some other veterans who were almost standing against the tide, saying like, "Wait, wait, wait, you can't just do movie parodies. You can't just do silly things. It has to speak a universal truth. It has to adhere to the emotional core of these characters." Honest to God, I found myself saying, "Guys, the Dean doesn't have to wear a dress every time he walks into the room." [LAUGHS] "Guys, we can't just do Cocktail for the sake of doing Cocktail. There has to be something true about why we're doing Cocktail."
This comes across as the most pretenctious pile of **** in the article, the lead writer/producer seem be, well, retarded. They had to comment on Harmon being fired, by making a crap episode, you can't do a movie tie in episode unless there is "truth" in it? They've pushed the characters away from being the original characters, but extreme narrow versions and they used to simply write good episodes with frequent movie themes, because it gave direction, something the show massively lacks right now.
If you look up who wrote in series 1 and 2 thats since left(many not there for series 3 and even more now), and who was there as the show got worse, its in particular this pretentious sounding a-hole, trying to make statements and seemingly trying to be different to the guys who did series 1, rather than trying to make a good show.
Honestly that interview, and looking up who left and the episodes they wrote leaves me with very little hope for the series.