Compact Flash Card "Speed"

Soldato
Joined
4 Mar 2003
Posts
12,450
Location
Chatteris
My wife owns a Canon 400d.
When I bought it for her a couple of years back, Compact Flash cards were quite pricy, so I bought as large capacity as I could justify.

Prices seem to have dropped now, so going to source a couple of higher capacity cards.
Is there a particular "speed" of card I should be looking at?

The Kingston 16GB 133x cards seem a bargain at around £27.
However I also see there are 233x and 300x cards available (for a lot more money, 16GB 300x at around £115).
Do I really need anything faster than 133x?
 
Associate
Joined
14 Jul 2004
Posts
1,778
Location
England
i asked this same question afew months back... essentially, card speed wont matter for the shooting, unless u shoot continously and saturate the camera memory... doubt most of us will...

will only be advantageous when u read off the card in a faster transfer speed....

i saved some dosh by just getting a 133x card rather than the fastest there is....
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Feb 2006
Posts
10,637
I use 2x8GB Kingston 133x cards on my D200, shooting RAW continuous it seems fine, i chose two 8GB over one 16GB card, too.
 
Associate
Joined
20 May 2007
Posts
1,198
Location
Bath, Somerset
I bought a couple of 32gb Kingston one from the bay... x133 complete overkill, full wedding shoot was under 1/3 a single card raw+jpeg

The buffer of my 40D runs out much faster than with my 300x 8gb ones, but as said above I'm not covering sports/ Wildlife
 
Soldato
Joined
13 Jan 2004
Posts
23,680
Location
South East
I just stick with x133, and I doubt I will buy anything more than 8Gb as I would hate to fill a 16 or 32Gb card up only to have it fail.

For that reason I have two 4Gb cards and one 8Gb card. If I start doing more weddings I may well get a couple more 8Gb ones.
 
Back
Top Bottom