Constantine - Under Rated?

I'm just not really in to the angels demons and stuff like that, and I wonder if that was part of the reason it failed? I can't really think of any other, because it pretty much had everything it needed to be a success.
 
Last edited:
I'm just not really in to the angels demons and stuff like that, and I wonder if that was part of the reason it failed? I can't really think of any other, because it pretty much had everything it needed to be a success.

Possibly that and this came out before the comic book boom, before this the only real successful film similar was Blade.
 
So...Here's the thing about comic book movies. A lot of them get made, they're loved for different reasons but the one commonality all them has is that they're made with a certain degree of embarrassment of the source material because despite comic book nerds spending divorce inducing amounts of money on collectible comics, statues and literally bringing a franchise back from the dead (here's looking at you, star trek) - the community is not seen as profitable.

It makes sense, you should always make your product to appeal to the widest possible audience (this is why I think the MCU phase I to III did so well, and the others have done relatively poorly), but the production and the storytelling suffers a lot of the time because of it, and because I think people that hold the purse strings look at metrics and lack the vision to see beyond the comic book genre.

Constantine for example would make a fantastic, all out horror but they rarely make any money on the large screen.
 
Back
Top Bottom