Cooked with rG-tom: 28 Day Mature Rib Eye and Savoury Mash

Status
Not open for further replies.
My mouth is watering, looks lovely.

I prefer a flat pan as although the griddle lines look fancy, the charring gets all over the outside rather than just in lines.

The photos are terrible.

Finally, no matter how rare the steak, there will always be someone saying it's overdone. It's the manly thing to say :p.
 
Well, yes.

Your eye is just a lens, the 'aperture' of which can change. Hold your hand up in front of you and focus on it, everything else will go out of focus.

Then surely we don't need a camera to put it out of focus for us?

Plus, I'm quite sure I can look at a steak on a plate on a plate without half of it going blurry and the mash being indistinguishable from anything else.

It's obvious thought and effort has gone into taking nice pics for a lovely thread to present, but it's just a bit too much, sorry.
 
Then surely we don't need a camera to put it out of focus for us?

But photos are viewed on a 2d plane, that's why you're used to everything being in focus in them. You do need a camera to put things out of focus to replicate the effect of actually viewing something.


Plus, I'm quite sure I can look at a steak on a plate on a plate without half of it going blurry and the mash being indistinguishable from anything else.

I doubt you could up close and in dim light, like those pictures are. Depth of field decreases the closer you are to a subject, as well as when there's limited light as your pupil will dilate to let more light in.
 
Then surely we don't need a camera to put it out of focus for us?

Plus, I'm quite sure I can look at a steak on a plate on a plate without half of it going blurry and the mash being indistinguishable from anything else.

It's obvious thought and effort has gone into taking nice pics for a lovely thread to present, but it's just a bit too much, sorry.

But when a photo is taken, you are turning a 3D situation into a 2D image. Then your eyes is not going to convey that into how it would have looked.

When you take a photo on your phone camera, have you not ever think...this is not how it look? It never looked like that. Go try it now, take a photo of anything and compare to what you see.

And no need to apologise.
 
But when a photo is taken, you are turning a 3D situation into a 2D image. Then your eyes is not going to convey that into how it would have looked.

When you take a photo on your phone camera, have you not ever think...this is not how it look? It never looked like that. Go try it now, take a photo of anything and compare to what you see.

And no need to apologise.

No need for photography lessons. :p
 
The truth is, this effect is everywhere.

Turn on the TV, anything on TV, you will notice this.

Hell, turn on BBC news, apart from the presenter, look at the background, that is out of focus too, you don't see people complain about that.

Watch any movies, it's even more prominent.

Look at any food cook books.

I think people are not used to it because they are bombarded with photos they see only on Facebook, photos that taken on a very narrow aperture, so when they see something different to that being shown on a "non professional" level, off the TV, off a book and movie screen, like on a forum, their brain just can't take it. It is literally confusing.

When the truth is that is is everywhere.
 
It's everywhere, but done by a professional it works.

Unfortunately the reduction in cost of photography equipment these days means that everyone with a zoom lens on a digital camera thinks they are a professional photographer.
 
It's everywhere, but done by a professional it works.

Unfortunately the reduction in cost of photography equipment these days means that everyone with a zoom lens on a digital camera thinks they are a professional photographer.

When it is works, it works, whether it is professionally or whether it is for fun.

As for reduction in the cost of photography equipment, i could have done that on a camera that is 50 years old on film that cost peanuts. It is nothing to do with costs, it is to do with how to.

And OP's camera and lens is value about the same as most hatchbacks...

And instead of saying "the mash is blur", it would be more accurate to put "I want to see what the mash looks like too". As the intention of the steak photo was the steak, not the mash.
 
Last edited:
I eagerly await further threads from photographers taking blury photographs and giving lessons on how to cook steak.

Perhaps do toast though please next time, it's at the same difficulty level as cooking steak, if not a bit harder!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom