That's true, but the wording of the directive makes no mention of the type of site this is for, so it must be assumed all sites are subject to the £500,000 fine if found guilty.
Yeah, that doesn't include the time to filter out customers who do actually use cookies, half of them employ SEO companies who end up putting various bits of analytics code in and we never get to hear about it.
I hate this change in law more than IE6. What a waste of time.
Also the chance of someone actually being fined in court, pretty low? I think. Google hasn't been bothered, msn.com hasn't been bothered. Heck lloyds tsb, natwest haven't bothered.
I hate this change in law more than IE6. What a waste of time.
Also the chance of someone actually being fined in court, pretty low? I think. Google hasn't been bothered, msn.com hasn't been bothered. Heck lloyds tsb, natwest haven't bothered.
MSN.com is probably hosted outside of the EU (same for google), Natwest has an obvious cookie policy alert on their site and Lloyds also link to their new cookie policy so they're using implied consent.
implied consent is the way to go it seems, just show the notice once, make a cookie on the users PC so they never see it again. this is the way barclays have gone also.
implied consent is the way to go it seems, just show the notice once, make a cookie on the users PC so they never see it again. this is the way barclays have gone also.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.