Cooking with **** - Live Fish and Live Snake

Status
Not open for further replies.
Its a ******* fish! It has no idea whats going on! They die in their hundreds of thousands every day in less humane ways. You hippies need to wake up, it's called the food chain.. Big animals eat smaller animals. Do you see Lions and sharks trying to be humane? Maybe we should kill all the Lions and sharks so nothing like this ever happens again.
Won't somebody please think of the children :rolleyes:
 
WOW doesn't that look like fun :eek::eek:

Poor fishy, that wasn't nice at all, at least chop its heard off before doing that rather than having him sit there, and what looks to be still alive :eek:
 
Its a ******* fish! It has no idea whats going on! They die in their hundreds of thousands every day in less humane ways. You hippies need to wake up, it's called the food chain.. Big animals eat smaller animals. Do you see Lions and sharks trying to be humane? Maybe we should kill all the Lions and sharks so nothing like this ever happens again.
Won't somebody please think of the children :rolleyes:

What he said.
 
Its a ******* fish! It has no idea whats going on! They die in their hundreds of thousands every day in less humane ways. You hippies need to wake up, it's called the food chain.. Big animals eat smaller animals. Do you see Lions and sharks trying to be humane? Maybe we should kill all the Lions and sharks so nothing like this ever happens again.
Won't somebody please think of the children :rolleyes:

Well done on completely failing to see the point.

Lions and Tigers should not be compared to humans, unless of course you think they are of a similar level of intelligence?

Surely as the most advanced species on the planet we have a responsibility to prevent suffering where possible? Why not just hit the fish on the head before slicing it up? I don't think anyone here has an issue with eating other species, it is causing unnecessary suffering which riles people. You seem to have completely missed that point. Just because a tiger shows no empathy doesn't mean you can apply the same logic to a human.

EDIT: well done on resorting to the "hippie" comment, the favoured choice of insult for slack jawed imbeciles everywhere.
 
Why "as the most advanced species" do we have this responsibility to prevent suffering?
Its a fish and a snake, i dont think they have the mental capacity to suffer
 
Well done on completely failing to see the point.

Lions and Tigers should not be compared to humans, unless of course you think they are of a similar level of intelligence?

Surely as the most advanced species on the planet we have a responsibility to prevent suffering where possible? Why not just hit the fish on the head before slicing it up? I don't think anyone here has an issue with eating other species, it is causing unnecessary suffering which riles people. You seem to have completely missed that point. Just because a tiger shows no empathy doesn't mean you can apply the same logic to a human.

EDIT: well done on resorting to the "hippie" comment, the favoured choice of insult for slack jawed imbeciles everywhere.

You are forgetting that we are animals too. Also, if it is because we're so called "intelligent" then why don't we see Dolphins killing fish "humanely" as they are apparently more "intelligent" than us Humans.
 
Why "as the most advanced species" do we have this responsibility to prevent suffering?
Its a fish and a snake, i dont think they have the mental capacity to suffer

We may choose to eat meat; nothing wrong with that. But if a fish can be killed humanely or not, why on earth would we choose the latter? Generally people of low intelligence suffer from a lack of empathy, maybe why you find this concept difficult to grasp.

Also kenshinu, Dolphins more intelligent than humans? What exactly are you talking about? Dolphins are sea mammals. They might be the most intelligent things in the ocean, but you don't see them using tools, creating civilisations and venturing into space, do you? They also don't have the capacity to kill something humanely - they simply need to eat to survive. As humans we don't suffer this limitation - we can choose to kill an animal in a humane manner.
 
Its a ******* fish! It has no idea whats going on! They die in their hundreds of thousands every day in less humane ways. You hippies need to wake up, it's called the food chain.. Big animals eat smaller animals. Do you see Lions and sharks trying to be humane? Maybe we should kill all the Lions and sharks so nothing like this ever happens again.
Won't somebody please think of the children :rolleyes:

Lions, tigers and other predators dont kill to entertain other members of their species do they?

I found this vid a little disturbing simply because i dont like the idea of animals suffering for entertainment purposes, not because im a hippy or anything like that.
 
Also kenshinu, Dolphins more intelligent than humans? What exactly are you talking about? Dolphins are sea mammals. They might be the most intelligent things in the ocean, but you don't see them using tools, creating civilisations and venturing into space, do you?

And how the **** is a dolphin going to blast itself into space? Like you said they are sea animals, so they aren't going to have hands to use tools or create civilisations. Just because they can't do the same things we do, doesn't make them less intelligent.
 
And how the **** is a dolphin going to blast itself into space? Like you said they are sea animals, so they aren't going to have hands to use tools or create civilisations. Just because they can't do the same things we do, doesn't make them less intelligent.

By the same token, how could a dolphin humanely kill a fish? It can't. Your argument is flawed; we are talking about humans, not animals. Humans have the capacity to kill in a humane manner, which should always be the chosen option.

Unless you are suggesting a dolphin somehow grip a fish and whack it on the head to kill it?
 
Despite the controversial nature of this, I still think it's a legitimate culinary method and although I don't agree with it, I don't think it breaks the rules.

I thought the posting standard in force at the moment was that if it was safe for daytime tv it was safe for the forum. Can you point me in the direction of the daytime tv cooking program showing graphic animal death, or the daytime documentary on bloodsports showing the actual killing of the animal, with close ups of the corpse and grinning dog owner, or the Amateurs cooking programme showing how not to kill and cook a crab? OCUK has become very distasteful in the last few days. Especially as the OP has admitted in this very thread that the sole reason for him staring this thread was to *provoke* a response from the "tree huggers"
 
I thought the posting standard in force at the moment was that if it was safe for daytime tv it was safe for the forum.

Where did you get that from?

OCUK has become very distasteful in the last few days.

It's not that bad, these things happen all the time, just because you don't want to see them doesn't mean it's not worthy for debate.

Especially as the OP has admitted in this very thread that the sole reason for him staring this thread was to *provoke* a response from the "tree huggers"

Whilst I admit that could be construed as trolling, I think the thread has kept within the realms of a decent debate.
 
Where did you get that from?

Didn't you get the memo? I think the edict came from the "babes" thread. Apparently it is not safe to show a picture of a nipple, but is is ok to show a video of a snake having its head cut off.

It's not that bad, these things happen all the time, just because you don't want to see them doesn't mean it's not worthy for debate.

I'm sure they do. If I was running a forum though, I would probably try not to nail my card carrying hunting credentials or whatever to the mast so blatantly, and instead would probably try to be impartial with a view to not upsetting potential customers. However, this thread is not realated to that....

Whilst I admit that could be construed as trolling, I think the thread has kept within the realms of a decent debate.

By "could be construed as" you mean "is". How many other trolling threads are closed daily on a routine basis?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom