Could the moon be an alien spaceship?

semi-pro waster said:
I think we're not giving the aliens enough credit for the prescience to leave the spaceship there approximately 4.5 billion years ago (what's a couple of hundred million years between interstellar friends?) - it's quite astonishingly far-sighted, I thought games of Risk took a long time but to play the game with a turn taking 4+ billion years is something else entirely. Without it the stabilising effect on the Earth's axis wouldn't exist, we'd not have such regular tides and there wouldn't be the occasional funky lunar or solar eclipse - in point of fact there's a chance we wouldn't even be here but for that. Although admittedly they have shown a bit of forgetfulness and a distinct (but perhaps understandable) reticence to make contact since then, I'd be a bit embarrassed if I'd left my spaceship orbiting a planet for that length of time - perhaps we should consider charging them for parking, the sort of penalty charges for that would surely clear any global deficit.
Click to expand...

You're missing the point that the Aliens are at least 4.5 billion years older than us and are way more advanced. They could have seen this infant planet being formed and through 4.5 billion year old calculations work out that it wouldn't survive unless they put a stabilising gizmo in place. You're not opening your mind.
 
Didn't someone post a similar thing a while back when the Necrophiliacs or something made us to mine gold. I agree however.
 
Icke said that Arran would be absorbed into the sea in the 80's, it didnt happen, ergo anything else Icke says should be taken with a pinch of salt.

Credit to him, he's carved a good living out of loonie conspiracy theories.
 
IckeSaucer.gif
 
Fenris said:
Lysander said:
hence the reason for their never going back.
Click to expand...

You mean except for the other 5 times?
Click to expand...

Add to that the two mechanized rovers the USSR sent (they are much better than humans at exploration so the was no point sending men after Armstrong's foot hit the floor) which covered over 30 miles of the surface returning over 100,000 pictures and numerous soil/rock analysis and spectrometer datas.

If the USA discovered something you can bet that the much more intensive investigative work the USSR did uncovered it too and it would have come out after the USSR fell.
 
Lysander said:
Now I realise this is a YouTube link but the possibilities here are so vast that it's worth discussing.

None of us here have been to the moon so we can't say we have any authority on it other than what we are told. Yes we are supposed to believe it is a natural satellite but how did it really come to be there? The moon may well be artificial hence the amount of titanium on its surface, and the chances are that NASA found more than they bargained for when they landed there in 1969 [i.e. possibilities of alien habitation] hence the reason for their never going back.

The most extreme theory is that the moon itself is some kind of alien vehicle and could even be used to monitor earth which would explain the amount of UFOs we so frequently encounter.

So what are the chances of the moon being anything other than what we are told it is?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=_SYA3lo_JS0
Click to expand...

It would be an interesting theory and to be fair it is, but the fact that David Icke presented this, completely ruins any kind of discussion, regardless of the fact that you posted this in the General Discussion section of OCUK, you are asking to get flamed to death and trolled.

Present us some more credible information and post it, but if you post anything that is against societies opinions, this is what you will face:

7e8Bj.png
 
Oh I don't know, the inner geek would love for there to be some sort of ancient alien ruins buried deep under the moon's surface, concealed for millions of years. Maybe it was the facility they used to seed genetic material onto planets so that they'd follow a humanoid evolutionary path?

But the reality of it is that it's more likely to be a hunk of rock, and until proven otherwise (not simply speculated), it is a hunk of rock.

A beautiful hunk of rock, which defines our night sky, another world.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom