Soldato
- Joined
- 25 May 2003
- Posts
- 9,361
- Location
- Limehouse
Rosbif said:Its not right that we have players learning how to play cricket at international level. We've gone through this with Mahmood and it has been an absolute disaster for the team. Panesar isn't going to be as bad for the team as Mahmood, that would be a gross exaggeration because as you say he is economical, but he doesn't have that wicket taking ability that other specialist bowlers have and there is no precedent for him taking one day wickets. The question I ask myself is whether having a specialist seamer in the squad in place of Panesar would serve us better.
Like who? Plunkett isn't much better than Mahmood when it's not his day. That's the problem with our bowling atm. Both Mahmood and Plunkett can be brilliant from time to time, but mostly bowl pretty poorly. Monty is at least consistently economical which is as useful as taking wickets in the one day game.

.