Validation: http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/bz7s9/
Need to play around with clocks, would like a higher shader clock, might be possible by lowering core.
What res and settings?
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Crysis SP Demo GPU Benchmark Thread
- Thread starter Tom|Nbk
- Start date
What res and settings?
1280x1024 - All Settings on HIGH in-game. (No AA selected)
I used Supersampling, H.QUALITY, no Optimisations as well in the NV CP.
Just goes to show, you don't need a super-high rig to still enjoy this game (obviously if you want eye-candy then you do). I've averaged 30FPS but I play on MEDIUM, not HIGH, and it still looks good imo. I think my AMD CPU is starting to get long in the tooth now and is holding me back though. Lol.
I used Supersampling, H.QUALITY, no Optimisations as well in the NV CP.
Just goes to show, you don't need a super-high rig to still enjoy this game (obviously if you want eye-candy then you do). I've averaged 30FPS but I play on MEDIUM, not HIGH, and it still looks good imo. I think my AMD CPU is starting to get long in the tooth now and is holding me back though. Lol.
Yer i know..it doesn't make much sense...i'm a little nervous bout putting on the latest drivers incase it won't let me backdate them if that is the issue. Can nobody else try to get hold of 162.18 and see what happens
If it is a driver issue i expect a blue peter badge at the very least 
I've honestly got them all on high @ 1280x1024.. just makes no sense.
Associate
- Joined
- 24 Jun 2003
- Posts
- 1,647
nice thread on the benchmarks, and thought i would give them a try,, but noob Q ,, how do u run the benchmark.
EDIT found the folder with the file in it : C:\Program Files\Electronic Arts\Crytek\Crysis SP Demo\Bin32
EDIT found the folder with the file in it : C:\Program Files\Electronic Arts\Crytek\Crysis SP Demo\Bin32
Caporegime
- Joined
- 8 Jul 2003
- Posts
- 30,063
- Location
- In a house
162.18's will need to be modded for the GT, as they were released in July. 
nah all high
Just done all medium now (apart from objects high, shaded) to compare incase these drivers don't take advantage of some of the effects or something as it may explain the performance but the graphics looked far worse on medium..
All high @ 1280x1024 =
min 39.5
average 50.5
Max 68
All medium @ 1280x1024 =
Min 31.81
average 52
Max 68
Bit too close? i dunno whats going on really. Be interesting when i get my GT to see what happens.
All high, 1280x1024, graphics cards settings are in the verification link.
Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Nov 2004
- Posts
- 9,871
- Location
- UK
XP [email protected] G92-GT@700/1750/2000. NVCP- Quality,Trilinear,
1280x1024 All High.
1680x1050 All High, Postprocessing Med.
1280x1024 All High.
1680x1050 All High, Postprocessing Med.
XP [email protected] G92-GT@700/1750/2000. NVCP- Quality,Trilinear,
1280x1024 All High.
1680x1050 All High, Postprocessing Med.
weird 1280x1024 all high my results aint far off from yours yet at 1680x1050 all high post processing med you have a massive gain, is the quad core helping?
Yer i know..it doesn't make much sense...i'm a little nervous bout putting on the latest drivers incase it won't let me backdate them if that is the issue. Can nobody else try to get hold of 162.18 and see what happens
I've honestly got them all on high @ 1280x1024.. just makes no sense.
I'm going to have a go with those drivers, let you know what happens.
Associate
- Joined
- 6 Jul 2006
- Posts
- 1,507
- Location
- co durham
here is mine,its with set to quality in control panel and not performance
here is mine,its with set to quality in control panel and not performance
aaaaaaand settings you use in crysis??
Base Line Scores - Stock 8800GT
The settings are pretty much straightforward although I have left 'Sound Quality' at high throughtout and drivers are default (no tweaks).
I did notice that once you enable AA the the Shader-Quality switches itself to *high*
The results so far are all baseline and the card is running completely at stock, as noted before I am letting the benchmark loop itself four times then averaging the results instead of cherry picking the best one lol!
Personally I don't think any results that have a minimum framerate under 30fps is playable!
The settings are pretty much straightforward although I have left 'Sound Quality' at high throughtout and drivers are default (no tweaks).
I did notice that once you enable AA the the Shader-Quality switches itself to *high*
The results so far are all baseline and the card is running completely at stock, as noted before I am letting the benchmark loop itself four times then averaging the results instead of cherry picking the best one lol!
Personally I don't think any results that have a minimum framerate under 30fps is playable!
Personally I don't think any results that have a minimum framerate under 30fps is playable!
What makes you think that? just because the number is less than 30 dont mean its unplayable, also say at 25fps, it does not feel laggy, feels more like 30.
Associate
- Joined
- 6 Jul 2006
- Posts
- 1,507
- Location
- co durham
all set to high
Nice looks like my results are pretty much what should be for my card, just annoying when you get the odd member come in and post there results to find there like 20fps ahead with lower clocked setup, odd
My average went from 45 on the 169.04's to 37 on the 162.18's.
I'm guessing you are doing something wrong then by the looks of it.
lol i just can't see how!! We're all doing the GPU benchmark yea and not the CPU one ?
This is the Graphics Cards forum