So whilst you're complaining about this guy holding onto his domain you're also buying up any domain that's a bit like the one you use for your business? Hypocrite tbh![]()
He is not squatting though if he has had it over 10 years and is clearly using the site.
not really. google's done the same thing. type gogole.com and google will come up...

If he's using it legitimately and hasn't obviously set it up as a link farm to steal your traffic then there's not a lot you can do besides pay up or forget about it.He is not squatting though if he has had it over 10 years and is clearly using the site.
Indeed. He could be using it for email or any number of other functions that don't necessitate having a website.That fact that its not been updated does not mean it is not in use.
That fact that its not been updated does not mean it is not in use.
It's turnover, not profit. Your share might only be a fiver.What sort of work do you do Booner!?
I wants me some of that £27M![]()

Pay the man the 50 grand and you will have the domain nameJust because it hasn't been updated don't mean its not in use!
Having actually looked at the site, it's a blatant squat. The owner has mocked up a dummy site that "offers services" to avoid exactly what you want, whilst appearing completely undesirable so that they never actually get any bother. Good luck proving this though.
The same thing happened to a small company who owned bbc.com , boston something or other corp. They were forced to hand it over to the bbc.
R
Mehul
Blatent squat?
http://web.archive.org/web/19961230152807/http://www.webmart.com/
Same page was there in 1996!
Not changed much since tho http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.webmart.com/