Cyber Squatting

Exactly, this is no way cyber squatting bearing in mind its been there for 10 years.

I dunno, My Mate bought a PS2 domain on the Playstation launch. It was a good 5 years before he was approached for the domain name, and he made a nice packet.

A name like webmart is always going to get interest. Its short, simple, and its obvious. So if someone see's its available, It'd be snapped up and kept as an investment.
 
He may have bought legitimately in the 90's, no longer provides web services, and held onto the domain for profit. He is squatting. Note the difference between now and ten years ago? Absolutely none.


What if he still uses the domain for email and just doesnt use the site as many have already suggested?
 
then £50,000 is not worth it. Cheeky little **** if that is the case! :p

True but the point being is I dont see how you can prove that he is not using the site anymore. He could say something like "I receive 1 email a year" on it and this would still class as him using it.
 
My company owns trademarks and registration for the name of the company, it's quite large now (Turnover of £27million) and we own lots of IP in the forms of domain names and several online operations.

However, the one we want www.example.com is registered to some nobody who has some rubbish website up (rubbish being a white page with a paragraph and some links) which hasn't been updated since 1996.

He's entitled to do what he likes with his Website.

He is holding on to it and we loose lots and lots of referals because we have to use NAMEuk.com. We are willing to pay to get an official .com, but this guy now knows it is worth something to us... and want £50,000+ for the name.

This is called "capitalism". Welcome to the free market.

Can this be defined as Cyber Squatting?

I don't see how. His domain name existed before your company did. If the reverse was true, you might have a case. But it clearly isn't.

What can we do about this?

Suck it up and pay him.
 
If you wanted to locate your business to a shop that was boarded up and the landlord wanted £50k to sell you the shop, would you pay it or accuse him of squatting and try to force him to give it to you for less than it's worth*?

Same principle IMO.


*Worth of course being what someone is prepared to pay for it, not the cost of the bricks and mortar.
 
then £50,000 is not worth it. Cheeky little **** if that is the case! :p

1. How do you know it is not worth it? He may run his business through that domain.
2. Who is cheekier? Him for merely owning a website and not rolling over for the first little company that happens along, or you for trying to force his hand?
 
Don't think we are prepared to pay for it!

But it's not really capitalism....fair enough if they were a small printing firm and we bought it over etc etc... but he isn't making money out of it (quite obviously) and is just trying to rip us off... which means he will get nothing for it. There is profit, then there is greed.
 
1. How do you know it is not worth it? He may run his business through that domain.
2. Who is cheekier? Him for merely owning a website and not rolling over for the first little company that happens along, or you for trying to force his hand?

1.) he may, but I highly doubt that he would make the same amount of money that we are prepared to pay for simply the website name.

2.) It's not cheeky, it's business. I guess that is the game he is playing too, but shooting himself in the foot.
 
Don't think we are prepared to pay for it!

Then that is your choice. It is worth what someone will pay for it. If his price doesn't meet yours then he keeps it and you don't get it. If you're desperate for it you'll raise your offer, if he's desperate to sell it he'll come down. Thats how it works.

But it's not really capitalism....fair enough if they were a small printing firm and we bought it over etc etc... but he isn't making money out of it (quite obviously) and is just trying to rip us off... which means he will get nothing for it. There is profit, then there is greed.

It is capitalism. That is how our economy works.

I don't see how he is trying to rip you off. Either buy it at the stated price or don't. If you pay over the odds it is your fault, not anyone else's.

1.) he may, but I highly doubt that he would make the same amount of money that we are prepared to pay for simply the website name.
Yet you don't know that.

2.) It's not cheeky, it's business.
That is right, I'm glad you rescind your earlier post. You're still being cheeky though, even if he is not.
 
Back
Top Bottom