*** Cyberpunk 2077 ***
- Thread starter Neil79
- Start date
Control is the best game to showcase DLSS 2.0, it's remarkable the amount of detail it shows, more so than running at native resolution without it! If Cyberpunk pulls that off, I'll be happy, very happy.
It's almost necessary as well
Even with a 3090, max settings at native 4K is a not so amazing 40 FPS
Not jealous of 3090 peeps
We know you are a little bit
Honestly, thus far, I'm loving the 3090 Strix OC, it's a bloody beast. My waterblock for it should be arriving this weekend, so I'll finally get to stretch it's legs properly. Just in time for Cyberpunk.
Okay so tried Control and the results are pretty remarkable I have to say.
Playing on 1080p at max settings including all the RT options but DLSS at 520p and I honestly couldn't tell the difference in visual quality and yet it meant I went from 35-55 fps range to 80-120fps lol, WTF??
Playing on 1080p at max settings including all the RT options but DLSS at 520p and I honestly couldn't tell the difference in visual quality and yet it meant I went from 35-55 fps range to 80-120fps lol, WTF??
Caporegime
- Joined
- 1 Dec 2010
- Posts
- 53,757
- Location
- Welling, London
Still annoying though to spend hundreds on a brand new GPU but still have to compromise to run a new game acceptably
Yeah the cpu worries me slightly as I don't know what the utilisation in this game is like. Worst case I sell a kidney and upgrade my pc
Keep in mind that is old PC footage, not the state of the current PC version.
Until brute force RT cores are the norm, real time simulation of light and shadow will always be a bit of a killer without workarounds like DLSS to improve framerates and quality at the same time. IMO it's a win win but it also does mean you are pretty much fixed on one vendor. AMD are too far behind to have anything viable to DLSS, and Microsoft doesn't have anything to compete yet in DirectX. nVidia are years ahead and have established the platform for DLSS.
They just need to sort out their damn stock issues!
Until brute force RT cores are the norm, real time simulation of light and shadow will always be a bit of a killer without workarounds like DLSS to improve framerates and quality at the same time. IMO it's a win win but it also does mean you are pretty much fixed on one vendor. AMD are too far behind to have anything viable to DLSS, and Microsoft doesn't have anything to compete yet in DirectX. nVidia are years ahead and have established the platform for DLSS.
They just need to sort out their damn stock issues!
Unfortunately I still need a lot of other parts so I probably won't be blocking up until some time next year. I've gone and made things harder on myself by deciding I MUST have glass tubing as wellWe know you are a little bit
Honestly, thus far, I'm loving the 3090 Strix OC, it's a bloody beast. My waterblock for it should be arriving this weekend, so I'll finally get to stretch it's legs properly. Just in time for Cyberpunk.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 1 Dec 2010
- Posts
- 53,757
- Location
- Welling, London
DLSS is the reason I can’t understand why anyone is rushing for a 6800 instead of a 3080.
Soldato
- Joined
- 26 Sep 2013
- Posts
- 10,756
- Location
- West End, Southampton
Maybe they don't play the handful of games that supports it.
Whilst true, having an RTX opens up many options. Why limit your options at this price point?
Why are people always thinking in terms of the here and now. More and more games will have it in future, with an aim to have it function on literally anything that uses TAA if certain people are to be believed
The life span of cards will increase also
Because what usually happens is the current gen hardware is outdated by time these features become widespread enough to really care about.
That doesn't matter quite so much when the whole point of the feature is that you switch it on and it makes your outdated hardware feel not quite so outdated
Bloody nora! Doing a build log? I'd love to see that!