+1Then I would be preparing for a big disappointment lol
EA have done nothing but ruin much loved franchises for me
I hear it is very vertical so small map may not be an issue anyways. I honestly think this game is going to be awesome.People moaning about a ‘small map’. I’d rather an interestingly crafted map than sprawling boring empty space like AC Odyssey. Plus it looks like a lot of the city expansion is vertical.
I hear it is very vertical so small map may not be an issue anyways. I honestly think this game is going to be awesome.
I will be exploring so much that I can see it lasting longer than W3.That'd be cool too ... my concerns with a small map would just be a lack of exploration and content (earlier in the thread someone linked the thing where they said it'd be a shorter story than Witcher 3) ... but if I can explore up through some kinda bladerunner-esque cityscape that'd be cool
I will be exploring so much that I can see it lasting longer than W3.
So all that fuss over "crunch" and it lasted a week...
I suspect "Crunch" will involve working on the day 1 patch
A game going gold doesn't mean they shut up shop. They will continue to test, fix and find bugs right up to launch and after releasing patches.
Among other things yeah.
Only 50 hours instead of 100? OH NOa shorter story than Witcher 3
And you can’t know how much I explored W3.You can't really know that till the game is out, it'll be good if there's a lot of stuff to explore around and find and investigate outside of the main story, and I'd have faith in CDPR that it won't be too lacking ... but you can't say how much you'll be doing when you've got no idea what and how much is even in there.
Or Activision
They seem to becoming the new EA
Honestly, Blood and Wine could easily have been a standalone with how big it wasI'd imagine the DLC to be quite substantial too, like W3 - so there could be an extra 20-30 hours.
Yeah, I've still not completed it...Honestly, Blood and Wine could easily have been a standalone with how big it was