David Cameron 'orders new curbs on Internet Porn'

When you ask that question it shows how unintelligent you are!

Did we really need to resort to name calling/personal attacks at such an early stage?

I'm just curious to know what you personally think are the disgusting things are.

I'd also be grateful if you could explain to me why I'm unintelligent for not knowing your exact opinion. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
When you ask that question it shows how unintelligent you are!

So, you have a few kids, aged between say 2 and 10, what do you think would benefit them from looking at porn? Get real for goodness sake.
you dont monitor your kids internet use? how do you know they arent in chatrooms talking to men looking to abuse kids? maybe the goverment should just ban the internet because it is to dangerous when kids can access it without being properly monitored by their parents..

I remember when I was a kid and we always used to find porno mags on the street... maybe they should ban the internet porno so kids can enjoy the joys of finding sexual materials adults have masterbated on and tossed out.

wait a minute did I just see a nipple on page three? OMFG they let children buy newspapers that contain nuditity this is sane but the internet isnt MADNESS!
 
Last edited:
Did we really need to resort to name calling/personal attacks at such an early stage?

I'm just curious to know what you personally think are the disgusting things are.

I'd also be grateful if you could explain to me why I'm unintelligent for not knowing your exact opinion. :rolleyes:

It's not name calling. It's how dull you must be to have to ask what would be disgusting about kids viewing porn!

How old are you for goodness sale?

I wouldn't want my 6 year old viewing porn. Now, I wonder why?
 
you dont monitor your kids internet use? how do you know they arent in chatrooms talking to men looking to abuse kids? maybe the goverment should just ban the internet because it is to dangerous when kids can access it without being properly monitored by their parents.

But, as said before, lots of parents don't give a monkeys what they kids do. It's the kids that need protecting.
 
It's not name calling. It's how dull you must be to have to ask what would be disgusting about kids viewing porn!

How old are you for goodness sale?

I wouldn't want my 6 year old viewing porn. Now, I wonder why?

Calling someone unintelligent is name calling...

Age is irrelevant.

I asked a question asking about YOUR OPINION as to what YOU found particularly disgusting about children watching porn. Firstly, we are yet to define what a child is. Secondly, there are many, many aspects of porn, I was interested into which one you raised the most objection to.

By definition a child is:
Noun
A young human being below the age of full physical development or below the legal age of majority.
A son or daughter of any age.

This could mean, let's say a 12 year old. This, IIRC is the age you go to secondary school and when children may start gettin curious about sex and things like that. Would it really be that bad if these guys watched porn? They may have many of their questions answered...
 
Should we ban alcohol too in case a child opens a fridge and takes a can of beer out of it?
That is a good point. Sigma for PM! Everyone else who didn't think of this is a bad person who needs to think of the children.

EDIT: I have come to the conclusion that chicken should also be added to this ban as it can be dangerous to eat it raw, as a child might.
 
Last edited:
When I first signed up for a mobile phone contract with Orange I was blocked from accessing the OCUK forums because it was supposedly 'adult content' and so I had to call them and get the bar removed. I can foresee similar things happening if this were put in place. I completely do not trust other people to decide on what I can or cannot view.

Plus, porn is great. Even my girlfriend thinks so. So there...
 
Also, no internet censorship at all. Ever. Deal with copyright, porn and anything some other way, just don't put in place a mechanism to allow the state to take down sites. As Hunders says, you could consider OCUK adult material or whatever.
 
That is a good point. Sigma for PM! Everyone else who didn't think of this is a bad person who needs to think of the children.

EDIT: I have come to the conclusion that chicken should also be added to this ban as it can be dangerous to eat it raw, as a child might.

I approve of this. We will raise a generation of real MEN. They will grow up eating only MANfood as this is one of the few things that can't kill them so easily.

Either that or we will have a generation of fat slobs who won't move for fear of breaking something...
 
I still don't get the logic behind why some people having kids and being bad parents means that a single man like myself can't sign up for an internet connection and use it for what it's made for.

God, does anyone know a pre-pubescents child who actually gives a **** and has somehow been harmed by porn? They're not going to seek it out nor watch it because it is of no interest to them.

Honestly, it's be much easier to just ban children at this rate anyway. Children. Find them. Kill them. :)
 
how are they going to block porn anyway? you cant have a bot scan every image and movie on the internet they can only blacklist specific websites and there will always be other sites people can goto anyway
 
how are they going to block porn anyway? you cant have a bot scan every image and movie on the internet they can only blacklist specific websites and there will always be other sites people can goto anyway

There are some idiots on their soap boxes who doesn't understand technology or the Internet who support this view but on the whole it's not really about that. Some people won't be happy until the Internet is regulated like TV and thats means we're talking about a whitelist.
 
Back
Top Bottom