We are doomed then aren't we as it is a finite resource.
Poll: DELETED_74993
- Thread starter DELETED_74993
- Start date
- Status
We are doomed then aren't we as it is a finite resource.
+ any other modernised/industrialised country - so in fact we can count pretty much the whole world?
The hypocrisy is in the people who bleet about how big bad and evil the west is, they sit on forums and moan, some might even attend marches to protest and join anti govt/war marches.... then when all said and done they'll power up their laptops, stick eastenders on the box, drive down to McD's (in their oil powered car) and generally live a life of modern luxury. I say, go live in a jungle or a cave, or better yet, Libya:
What are you asking? Every person who joins the military is trained to be a soldier first and foremost but then specialises in a trade. A chef, in the broad sense of being in the military is a soldier, but you wouldn't label him/her a soldier, nor would you a nurse/pilot/geo spatial technician/mechanic/etc. In this sense no I am not a soldier.
But you aren't neutral at all, in fact your opinion and the posts you make appear completely one sided and very much narrow minded.
Furthermore would you actually give a toss about any of this if it wasn't spread all over the news and internet? I'm guessing not/
Well what are you if everyone's opinion is automatically inferior to your own?
Do tell...
You aren't neutral either, you normally wildly over react when people criticise the establishment that in turn gives you your Queen's shilling.
I never said the opinions of others were inferior however if peoples opinions are based solely on media sources then it must be concluded that the sources are inferior.
Good dig, very crass.
if you read back some of my first posts were wanting the UN to stop the fighting on both sides rather than tell gaddafi to ceasefire and pull back from all of the contested cities which would mean he should surrender the whole country apart from tripoli which was never going to happen just like the rebels were never going to agree to the first proposed ceasefire when it wasnt in their best intrest they knew the UN were on there side regardless of wether they stoped fighting or not.
they needed to tell the rebels to stay behind ajdabiya and gaffadi to stay behind brega or both sides would be bombed.
the UN is far from neutral and should not have chose one side over the other in a civil war if they wanted to end all of the fighting to protect civilians they would have made the same demands on both sides yet they didnt and still havent.
gaddafi and the rebels are as bad as each other the the western world only wants to see the gaddafi forces hated because its in their best intrests now unless cameron and sarkozi want to look like failures who will never win an election again i suspect both of them only did it to try and improve their opinion ratings in the first place
Last edited:
It isn't a dig, nor is it very crass?
Again, you take it too personally as you have just demonstrated.
I also take the Queen's shilling, my colleagues even joke about it, we don't find it anything like crassness?
You are not as neutral as you would like to make yourself out to be.
You did by your inference.
What are your sources in comparison to the validity of the rebels claims?
Yet I never claimed to be, where as others have despite displaying a one sided viewpoint. I am of course not neutral, however I am open minded and willing to take on board facts from numerous sources rather than just what I am fed on the news.
Your argumentative position led me to believe you were, throwing it out willy nilly so to speak.
Do accept what the state feeds you without logically validating it yourself?
They are just there to advise on military organisational structures, communications and logistics, including how best to distribute humanitarian aid and deliver medical assistance. I wonder if they will be providing a little more than the above?
Source
Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Nov 2009
- Posts
- 25,937
- Location
- Planet Earth
Looks like we are going to advice the rebels by sending some of our chaps over to Libya:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13132654
Edit!!
Already posted!!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13132654
Edit!!
Already posted!!
Last edited:
yea i was going to post that but i would have been bashed again the same as i was going to post a qoute from a british humanitarium worker that said there was no evidence of civilians beeing targeted.
the same as i was going to post about UN aid workers beeing allowed into the country..
anyway anyone who believes those officers are just going to advise and not train is very naive .
the same as i was going to post about UN aid workers beeing allowed into the country..
anyway anyone who believes those officers are just going to advise and not train is very naive .
human rights group criticizing western media and saying they have so far saw no evidence of any civilians beeing targeted by gaddafi
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Wo...addafi_Forces_Using_Violence_In_Western_Libya
intresting to see benghazi just recieved 48 brand new land cruisers probably paid for by british tax payers and they are obciously going to be used by the army for offensive action which imo should be considered military aid and not allowed
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Wo...addafi_Forces_Using_Violence_In_Western_Libya
intresting to see benghazi just recieved 48 brand new land cruisers probably paid for by british tax payers and they are obciously going to be used by the army for offensive action which imo should be considered military aid and not allowed
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 37,798
- Location
- block 16, cell 12
UN resolution isnt about regime change.
But Britain remain defiant that they wont stop destroying the infrastrucure of Libya until the regime is changed.
But Britain remain defiant that they wont stop destroying the infrastrucure of Libya until the regime is changed.
- Status