DELETED_74993

You believe that's the only reason Iran is seeking to acquire nuclear weapons? Although it has since been changed, were you aware that for a while, the Hezbollah party flag was a mushroom cloud, with a warning to the Jews underneath? You want a regime like this to actually have nuclear weapons?

You seem to be under the impression that Iran is perfectly entitled to have nuclear weapons. Don't forget that they are still claiming that they are not seeking them, that they have been legally bound to that effect numerous times by the IAEA, the UN and the EU. But you would be content for them to continue their development of nuclear WMD? Call me old fashioned, but I just can't abide the idea of a messianic theocracy attaining apocalyptic weaponry... But, I suppose Pakistan has them. It would only be fair for there to be a Shia nuke, as well. ;)

I think that the biggest threat to world peace is the USA, and has been for a long time.

Now if they would wind their neck in, abide by international law, stop invading and threatening other countries to get their oil resources etc. perhaps the world would be a safer place.
 
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...binet-support-for-Israeli-strike-on-Iran.html

The report, citing a senior Israeli official, said Mr Netanyahu was working with Ehud Barak, the defence minister, to win support from sceptical members of the cabinet who oppose attacking Iranian nuclear facilities.

Israel test-fired a ballistic missile from a military base in central Israel on Wednesday, Israel Radio said.

The report said the launch was carried out from the Palmachim facility. It quoted a Defence Ministry statement as saying the launch was aimed at testing the missile's propulsion system. Israel has Jericho missiles widely believed to be capable of carrying nuclear warheads.

The reports of Mr Netanyahu pushing for a military strike on Iran came after days of renewed public discussion among Israeli commentators about the possibility that the Jewish state would take unilateral military action against Iran.

Haaretz said that Mr Netanyahu and Mr Barak had already scored a significant win by convincing Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman to throw his support behind a strike.

And Iran is the bad country, yes?
 
I think that the biggest threat to world peace is the USA, and has been for a long time.

Now if they would wind their neck in, abide by international law, stop invading and threatening other countries to get their oil resources etc. perhaps the world would be a safer place.
Perhaps. But I just feel that claiming a free democracy is the greatest threat to world peace is a bit too far. I never miss an oppourtunity to criticise American foreign policy, but I can't bring myself to side with fascism and barbarism, over democracy.
 
because if you think this country is so bad and you are willing to support terrorists then you should just get out.

Have you experienced terrorism so far in your short life? Or are you just believe what your told on TV - no need 2 think 4 yourself? How many are dead in your family for for fighting for the opium and oil
? Full of ****, think so....
 
Perhaps. But I just feel that claiming a free democracy is the greatest threat to world peace is a bit too far. I never miss an oppourtunity to criticise American foreign policy, but I can't bring myself to side with fascism and barbarism, over democracy.

Sorry, are you calling the US a free democracy? Seriously?
 
Iran is a bad country. I have no love lost for Israel, but don't forget that Hezbollah, the Iranian proxy party, has effectively threatened Israel with nuclear war.

No, they haven't threatened anyone.

The US and Israel regularly do, however. And not just threaten, they actually attack or invade and occupy other sovereign nations.

Who is the rogue state?
 
Of course I don't support genocide. If only the same could be said about Israel :)

You would think with their past experience Israel would be somewhat better at it. Despite 60 years at genocide the population of Palestine is growing...
 
Oh dear. Here we go again.

I still cant ___________ believe they binned our Harriers. One of our soldiers best friends. And also we should buy A-10s.
 
If everybody started seeing things from each-others reality tunnels then maybe we would have a chance of having world peace.

By the closed minded way some people talk on here it would seem that we are far off from that thought. I guess the same type of closed mindedness is happening on some Iranian web forum too.

Why is it that everyone who doesn't want to take it up the bum from the western world or who have different customs (which is their own business) have to be evil?
 
Sorry, are you calling the US a free democracy? Seriously?
Well, if we are going by some notion of a generally accepted definition of what a democracy is, then yes, of course it is. I would gladly enter into a debate as to what the definition of democracy actually is, but that's for another time.

No, they haven't threatened anyone.

The US and Israel regularly do, however. And not just threaten, they actually attack or invade and occupy other sovereign nations.

Who is the rogue state?
Wow... Well, I would be interested to know to what extent you are aware of what Iranian foreign policy actually consists of. I can tell you outright that are you wrong about Iran having never threatened anybody, but you still haven't answered the original point about whether you think, in the fact of so much evidence to the contrary, Iran is entitled to have nuclear weapons?

US is a one party state just as Britain is. You can 'vote' but you get the same crap at the end of it.

Excellent point, I would be glad to discuss it further. ;) Although the term 'one party state' is an obvious technical inaccuracy.
 
Well, if we are going by some notion of a generally accepted definition of what a democracy is, then yes, of course it is. I would gladly enter into a debate as to what the definition of democracy actually is, but that's for another time.

Wow... Well, I would be interested to know to what extent you are aware of what Iranian foreign policy actually consists of. I can tell you outright that are you wrong about Iran having never threatened anybody, but you still haven't answered the original point about whether you think, in the fact of so much evidence to the contrary, Iran is entitled to have nuclear weapons?



Excellent point, I would be glad to discuss it further. ;) Although the term 'one party state' is an obvious technical inaccuracy.

Who has Iran threatened? Who have they threatened more than we do? Why are they not entitled to nukes when we have them? Who are to we to tell them what to do?
 
Back
Top Bottom