That doesnt mean that Gods and Afterlife are real:
I wasnt predisposed to believe in gods and afterlife and was raised in a strongly religious environment. I simply no longer could believe in what I considered to be myths and fairy tales since the age of 12, and this was my own personal choice, not influenced by anyone else. In fact everyone of my friends were also strongly religious, and I still attended religious assembly at school and at the temple over the weekends on top of RE classes.
If anything, people only believe in religion because it is constantly forced and brainwashed into them, and they simply believe everything they are told.
I already mentioned peer approval within the scientific academia several times, its not my problem that you missed that.
I dont believe anything in your second quote either, I strongly doubt that such papers would be automatically censored, and I dont see what is stopping any of these scientists from simply publishing their work themselves today on the internet if that is the case.
Your argument here is simply it doesnt exist because its been censored, but yet I'm too 'belligerent to examine or refference it impartially'.
You originally claimed that there is scientific investigation of the afterlife, yet now you claim there isnt because its censored, what a joke.
And that means that 80% of Atheists dont believe in spirituality. Also 'leading physicists and biologists' =/= atheists, the two surveys you are comparing are targeting entirely different demographics.
The researchers point out that the project was not setting out to prove the existence of god or otherwise, but sought to find out whether concepts such as gods and an afterlife appear to be entirely taught or basic expressions of human nature.
I wasnt predisposed to believe in gods and afterlife and was raised in a strongly religious environment. I simply no longer could believe in what I considered to be myths and fairy tales since the age of 12, and this was my own personal choice, not influenced by anyone else. In fact everyone of my friends were also strongly religious, and I still attended religious assembly at school and at the temple over the weekends on top of RE classes.
If anything, people only believe in religion because it is constantly forced and brainwashed into them, and they simply believe everything they are told.
I already mentioned peer approval within the scientific academia several times, its not my problem that you missed that.
I dont believe anything in your second quote either, I strongly doubt that such papers would be automatically censored, and I dont see what is stopping any of these scientists from simply publishing their work themselves today on the internet if that is the case.
Your argument here is simply it doesnt exist because its been censored, but yet I'm too 'belligerent to examine or refference it impartially'.
You originally claimed that there is scientific investigation of the afterlife, yet now you claim there isnt because its censored, what a joke.
Concerning the "leading physicists and biologists" question, well, that would depend on how you asked the question or conducted the survey. The latest survey I came across indicated that 20% of atheists were spiritual and that they found being spiritual was qualitatively more different to being religious.
And that means that 80% of Atheists dont believe in spirituality. Also 'leading physicists and biologists' =/= atheists, the two surveys you are comparing are targeting entirely different demographics.
Last edited: