You know, one thing leads to another, then another and so onHow has this turned from a thread about disabled benefits to national service?
You know, one thing leads to another, then another and so onHow has this turned from a thread about disabled benefits to national service?
I just watched an ITV News video posted last year about the amount of money the DWP lose fighting claims.
When someone gets denied their claim they can have a mandatory reconsideration. If that fails, so you've been denied twice by the DWP, you can take it to a tribunal. This is setup similarly to a court setting were people outside of the DWP are judging the claim. 80% of DWP decisions are overturned at this stage!
UK spent £440m fighting disability claims as system designed to 'block getting benefits' | ITV News
The government has spent £443.5m fighting disabled people who decided to appeal after being turned down for two key benefits, freedom of information data has...youtu.be
DWP breaks silence over starting bank account checks and says 'we have a duty'
DWP has been warned it risks causing “paranoia” if it refuses to axe plans to “spy” on benefit claimants’ bank accounts.www.google.com
I think spending almost a billion is outrageous compared to a few million on tax evasion.
yep agreed, all it does is to completely stress out genuine people and when the decision is over turned all the money gets back dated any ways, im just lucky i have a supporting family or i could have ended up in dire straights.
a lot of the assesors will out right lie about what was said and dimiss medical evidence, then it goes to a pen pusher with no medical knowledge and claim closed, then appeal and claim reopened and back dated, assuming u can survive that long with the large gap of no money coming in and the massive stress
its pretty disgusting tbh the way people are treated, can u turn a tap on? ok claim closed, that is not a exageration i have heard horror stories from other claiments
the people that do exploit the system are few and far between and they dont care if refused they will just make another claim or more likely multiple ones. while genuine people get demonised
Yep its horrible.
They will take your reply from a greeting as proof you can talk to people.
Example, assessor asks you how you are as part of greeting you.
You then answer, " I'm good" something you may normally say as an automatic response in conversation. They then use this as a reason to mark you down, as your "able to communicate" which lowers your award.
In reality this isn't telling the assessor anything, random things like this lead to lots of claims being rejected and going to tribunal.
Its utterly nerve racking, no website will prepare you to just skeet through this.
You can answer everything correctly and still score 0, with evidence.
yep agreed, all it does is to completely stress out genuine people and when the decision is over turned all the money gets back dated any ways, im just lucky i have a supporting family or i could have ended up in dire straights.
a lot of the assesors will out right lie about what was said and dimiss medical evidence, then it goes to a pen pusher with no medical knowledge and claim closed, then appeal and claim reopened and back dated, assuming u can survive that long with the large gap of no money coming in and the massive stress
its pretty disgusting tbh the way people are treated, can u turn a tap on? ok claim closed, that is not a exageration i have heard horror stories from other claiments
the people that do exploit the system are few and far between and they dont care if refused they will just make another claim or more likely multiple ones. while genuine people get demonised
So you want to train and arm a group of disgruntled and now politically disenfranchised people?But what if doing your duty shall we say was the only way to get a vote, how would you go then?
I posted this in another thread...and when broken down it isn't as bad.
Between 2010 and the onset of the pandemic in early 2020, the UK consistently had one of the lowest 15-64-year-old inactivity rates among G7 economies, with only Japan recording a lower rate in late 2019 (left panel of Chart A). The initial phase of the pandemic saw inactivity rise everywhere bar Germany, before falling everywhere but the UK in 2021 and 2022. This means that since the pandemic, the 15-64-year-old inactivity rate has increased in the UK by 0.5 percentage points and by 0.3 percentage points in the US (where modest falls in inactivity in 2021 and 2022 have not offset the rise in 2020), but fallen in the other five G7 economies (as shown in the right panel of Chart A). As a result, the UK’s inactivity rate has moved above that of Canada and Germany over this period, but remains below the OECD average.
Others includes people like me, in my 50's but took early retirement, although not taking a pension yet.
and start looking up at the ones at the top robbing them blind.
What gets me about carers allowance is that you can’t get it if you earn over £139 a week.From a quick look at caring and the rules, You also need to minus carers as they could be overlapping unemployed or retired or others and would definitely push up the count with repeated numbers. Also carers could be classified as working for the NHS because it saves the NHS.
Correct me if I am wrong about carers allowance. As I have zero knowledge of the working between carers and other benefits.
However, they provide service that the NHS or council should be providing. I think it should not be counted.
Now with the above information the numbers would look even lower.
Others what does that mean?
We now established it is not as bad as they say. It seems it is a blame game rather than taking responsibility for MPs running of the country.
The amount of funding is disproportionate to the crime.
When you've found that out for yourself why don't you come back and let us know.Do the boat folk count in those numbers?
I direct quote from where? Because i just searched the article both myself and you posted and found no mention of the word "refugees"This is a direct quote.
A growing amount of UK aid has been spent on UK-based refugees, with spending increasing from £410 million in 2016 to £3,690 million in 2022 (rising from 3.2% of the aid budget to 29%). The Home Office was responsible for £2,382 million of this aid (should say tax payers).
When you've found that out for yourself why don't you come back and let us know.
I direct quote from where? Because i just searched the article both myself and you posted and found no mention of the word "refugees"