but the result of an interaction isn't certain
I also added that people cause that to be so more than say a pair of chemicals.
but the result of an interaction isn't certain
perhaps fate is the residue of design.
which is essentially not fate. Surely if you can controll fate it's no longer fate?
You can't control what other people do though. There's also the free will argument...
but if you can't controll what other people do, and what they do is based on free will, then it's not fate, as what people impose on you do it because of free will.
not quite sure what you were saying.
I wasn't saying I agree with fate in the classical sense anyway.
so what is your idea of fate?
Fate doesn't really exist. There is no single, fixed future, if thats what you're taking fate to mean.
I agree with that, although that is just an opinion.
So if you don't believe in fate in the classical sense, how do yuo beleive in fate?
I think the whole world, and our lives revolve around probability.
every thing you ever encounter is all due to probabilty,
what are the odds you met a certain person, on a certain day, at a certain time, at a certain location?
Well, there is only a singular timeline to my knowledge, so that aspect is fine. Its what affects the events in that singular timeline that I disagree on.
but beleiving in a singular timeline isn't fate?
I don't think it's probability, it's just a case of lot's of factors all coming togethor to make something happen.
that is definitely a strong possibility, but you can look as all these events as probabilities, which to me makes more sense
But it kind of implies some sort of randomness, I don't think randomness actually exsists.