Originally posted by AlphaNumeric
To help you (if by the off chance you use Google), you're close, here the hint, check for the "Banach Algebra, L^2 Norm", that and Ashtons Theorum will make me a happy bunny
You do realise, nothing you posted makes any sense right?
Strange, but true. After all, even if someones memory fails them, Google will return Ashtons Theorum of Banach Spaces within a out 8 seconds (so says that funny time counter on my Google page, but then my Windows XP is horribly slow).
Because your posts imply 1>1, which is obviously false (by definition) and thus cannot be true. Memphisto, you wondered about maths not proving anything it wants, this guys posts are examples. I can use his posts to show 1>1
Fair enough, Ashtons Theorum can be complex if you don't remember the certain "jump" it make (hence its ingeniousness of its idea), but a general sketch of the idea would do fineOriginally posted by Haly
Ooh conspiracies abound
Originally posted by AlphaNumeric
Fair enough, Ashtons Theorum can be complex if you don't remember the certain "jump" it make (hence its ingeniousness of its idea), but a general sketch of the idea would do fine
If I mention the L^2 norm, does it help?
Like I said, you win, I lose, feel free to enjoy 
Originally posted by jokester
It takes a better man to admit that.
162 to go
Jokester
Memphisto, you have my utmost respect. You battled through your opinions, argued with us (after all, one who doesn't at least attempt to defend his views, has no views at all), and eventually listened to logical debate. I would happily buy you a drink, should we ever be in the same pub at the same time
Oh there's a reason. A very good reason. A reason that'll fix you good!
Originally posted by Locrian
I voted no, but only because i cant stand pig ignorant sciestists who, even in a world as crazy as ours, cannot admit that, for one tiny moment, they might, with the slimmest of possibility be wrong
Yours included btw Alpha
You know the theorum you said :
Turns out I made it upOriginally posted by Haly
I don't remember it fully except for the very basic idea I gave you
Ashtons Theorum doesn't exist 
It's the surname of a mate of mine who I thought would bre approprioate for naming such a "theorum" after. Hence why you disappearing for 20 minutes to google for "Ashton Theorem, Banach" didn't help you If you do understand such things, I'll meet you in Swansea when I get home in 6 weeks and talk face to face perhaps?
![Obl][vion](/styles/overclockers/avatars/banned.png){kind=avatar}