Does anyone know this Rover?

I'm not getting defensive, I'm just stating the fact that I know what I saw and am not about to have some wannabe know it all keyboard warrior call me a liar.
 
Just something I'd like to mention is that I believe the gearbox mated to the 220 as standard has rather short ratios, so I'm not sure if one from a Vitesse would be that much shorter to make a significant enough performance difference for you to keep up with an Accord Type-R kept in VTEC.

So, I can only assume that the Type-R wasn't kept in VTEC, which is a fair enough assumption. My mum/dad when "moving on" will rarely see past 5500rpm, which obviously wouldn't spur the Type-R on at quite maximum pace :p

On topic, I quite like it when people do crazy things that don't necessarily make sense, so 700hp in a Rover 25 is just plain cool :cool:
 
jamoor said:
never got involved in a rover crap debate but,
Rover is crap! why do you think BMW got rid of them?
Probably because after being unable to modernise the processes within Rover they couldn't see a future. So they extracted the Mini brand, which is generating them a very tidy amount of revenue today.

An interesting article if you're genuinely interested: http://www.austin-rover.co.uk/index.htm?whydbbrf.htm
 
Last edited:
The engine is running around 3bar boost :eek:

"Proven 7s odd 0-100mph
0-150mph was 16s, and top was 177mph as above, all on datron at brunters with redline. 177mph in about a mile was on his wrong tyres for top speed also and low pressure in them for drag traction!

the maestro and the 200 have both run 11.7s 130mph 1/4s on road tyres in road legal trim. he also ran 11.4s 132mph on drag slicks in the red rover 200.

his best 1/8th mile in the rover was 7.7s @ 108mph at pod, with a 2s 60ft"

The popping and banging is probably the Anti-lag / Traction control system
 
Firestar_3x said:
The T Series is a great engine, used in kit cars etc, it can give loads of power and be quite reliable even under high stress.

Its the rover way of doing things i don't like and the entire company structure.

As I understand it, the T Series is used in the Robin Hood superspec, which is the least aptly named kit car ever produced..

Far more popular in kits are Ford Zetec's and now Motorcycle engines...

What company structure? the chinese one?

;)
 
Perhaps i'm getting confused with the K then :)

The English Rover way of doing things, best thing the chinese can do is start with fresh staff that haven't been indoctrinated with the english rover way of erm not doing much.
 
PMKeates said:
Probably because after being unable to modernise the processes within Rover they couldn't see a future. So they extracted the Mini brand, which is generating them a very tidy amount of revenue today.

An interesting article if you're genuinely interested: http://www.austin-rover.co.uk/index.htm?whydbbrf.htm

Their opinion was that in terms of quality, Rover were as good as, if not in some cases better than, BMW. Rover appeared to fit perfectly with BMW
 
They (BMW) invested selectively, only in the areas that they could sell on at a profit once they had acquired capability in those areas themselves. The crippled Rover that was left was 'set free' as a manufacturer with no development facilities or on-going development to use, with a largely outdated model range and, initially at least, dependent on BMW for the purchase of components (engines and panels) without which they could not build any cars. Leaving BMW with the modern facilities, the products in the pipe-line that it had wanted all along (ie: those which complemented the BMWs rather than competed with them

Makes very interesting reading, although shows the foundation of the Rover demise (Post BMW atleast). What a sorry, sorry tale.
 
Back
Top Bottom