[TW]Fox;27429224 said:
I don't think I'd ever want to spend most of my driving time in a car I didn't like just so that I could drive one I did like at the weekend.
Got to agree with this comment. But then I guess it depends on how you define dull.
When I had my A3 2.0 TDI (back before the 170 bhp versions) I had it mapped, so was producing around 170 BHP. Not a huge amount of power, but was enough to make it decently fleet, and with the H&R suspension, it made a competent daily. I did however, during my ownership of this car, have a 1.8T Golf GTI chucking out 240 BHP, then a Golf V6 4Motion, then an Audi S4 (V8). They were all decently capable cars, but only the S4 actually felt special enough to be considered an decent enough step up from the daily.
The daily was than changed out for a A4 2.0 TDI 143 avant, then a 177 avant, then a e91 335d, all while keeping hold of the S4 (which I owned for 18 months). The 335d felt as quick as the S4, so that was swapped for a Range Rover.
Now I have my 530d and my (e46) 330i, and, to be honest, the 530d, whilst remaining the daily, is the better drive. I'll likely keep running decently quick, and nice cars as dailies, as I don't want to spend the majority of my driving in something that isn't as nice. I had my 1.9 TDI passat at the same time as my 530d, and despite being around 10 mpg better, I only did 10k in that last year, compared to the 18k I did in the 530d.
I get the point in running a second, more fun car, as a toy, but I would never be considering anything with less than 300 BHP to be suitable as such a vehicle (classic motors aside, like RS Mexicos or old Golfs etc). I'd rather do my miles in something I like to be honest. And if I can't afford a second car that is suitably special, I'd rather spend the running costs of such a second car on running a more desirable daily car.